1 - 2 of 9 Posts
Mstarn,
Thank you very much for your post on the Bullseye thread. I couldn't get info on the COAL for the 230 grain GS. I foolishly loaded my first 150 handloads to 1.266 to 1.275 in. like I had been loading 230 grain RN.
They fed my Kimber 5" and Ruger ok but I had trouble packing them into the magazines!
Now I know 1.235 is more appropriate.
I also picked up some Bullseye at the range today.
By the way, I had picked up the Golden sabers on sale at Midway or Natchez for about $46 for 500. I don't think many shooters use the 230 grain rather than the 185 grain.
Thank you very much for your post on the Bullseye thread. I couldn't get info on the COAL for the 230 grain GS. I foolishly loaded my first 150 handloads to 1.266 to 1.275 in. like I had been loading 230 grain RN.
They fed my Kimber 5" and Ruger ok but I had trouble packing them into the magazines!
Now I know 1.235 is more appropriate.
I also picked up some Bullseye at the range today.
By the way, I had picked up the Golden sabers on sale at Midway or Natchez for about $46 for 500. I don't think many shooters use the 230 grain rather than the 185 grain.
1 - 2 of 9 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
1911Forum
A forum community dedicated to all 1911 firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Recommended Communities
Join now to ask and comment!
