1911Forum banner

A Sign of the [Sad] Times at Colt's

7638 Views 72 Replies 40 Participants Last post by  hiker
As the proud owner of two Colt products, a 1973-purchased Series 70 Government Model (since worked on by Jim Stroh of Alpha Precision) and a Ted Yost Signature Grade LW Commander, I have great affection and reverence for the guns of the rampant stallion. Come to think of it, I have an LE6920 carbine, too, but I digress....

While attending the annual meeting of the Association of the United States Army in Washington, DC, this morning, I wandered into the Colt exhibit. Their booth was, as you might expect, heavy on long arms, but they also had a couple of displays of pistols, including a lovely nickel-plated SAA, and six or eight 1911s.

I was handling the CCO Gunsite pistol, a design I've always admired, and looked at the tag that had been printed, laminated, and attached to it, with key features, suggested retail price, etc.

To my dismay, it proclaimed the model I was holding to be the "Gunsight" model. :( The fact that the pistol was pretty roughly put together with a clunky trigger didn't do much for my morale, either.

OK, it's a small thing, but you know, to me it speaks volumes about Colt's lack of engagement in the marketplace. I wish like hell that Colt's would return the brand to what many of us would like to think of as its rightful place in the market, which it long ago ceded to Kimber, Springfield, et. al.

That would be something we could all be happy about.
41 - 60 of 73 Posts
I have been very satisfied with the fit, finish, reliability, and performance of my NRM Combat Commander.
RickB said:
So, what's the right price? I would pay as much for a NRM Commander as Kimber is charging for the Custom Classic (what's "custom", or "classic" about it, anyway?), and that's about where it's priced, isn't it? $700?
Try closer to $879 or thereabouts for a Colt Series 70. Many places want even more, over $1000 on the auctions.
For what it's worth, I have a very low serial number Colt Gunsite CCO that shoots to point of aim, digests anything I feed it, and is very attractive as well. The mags are junky, but that's easily fixed.

In my view, this is the perfect 1911 CCW piece. If this is poor quality, I'll take another serving.

Attachments

See less See more
Combat Commander XSE

In an earlier post I mentioned my new Combat Commander was shooting good groups but 2-3" left of POA. I brought the pistol to the range today to document target performance in order to help the gunsmith adjust the sites. I brought along some Hornady Custom 185 gr JHP/XTP and Hornady 200 gr TAP FPD. Nothing wrong with the sites (just the shooter)! It shot to POA with no problem. I guess it likes Hornady and not the plinking stuff I used last time (Federal Eagle 230 gr FMJ, IIRC). Anyway, my apologies to Colt. I do like this Combat Commander.
Gold Cup

DHart said:
...Personally, I think the Special Combat Government makes a MUCH nicer bullseye gun than the Gold Cup... just my 2 cents worth.
DHart,
I'd have to agree about the SGC, based on what I've read and know about the pistol. Given the price is ~50% greater than the Gold Cup, it should be a better performer. If I get a refund on the bad Gold Cup, I'll probably build on my Series 80 Government Model as a bullseye gun.
In general, I believe Colt is building some of the finest 1911s out-of-box on market today.:rock:
waltimari said:
For what it's worth, I have a very low serial number Colt Gunsite CCO that shoots to point of aim, digests anything I feed it, and is very attractive as well. The mags are junky, but that's easily fixed.

In my view, this is the perfect 1911 CCW piece. If this is poor quality, I'll take another serving.
I have had the same experience with the same pistol and with the addition of a front Heinie night sight, it is perfection; size, reliability, looks and "feel". My night time down-city choice.

HiCap
I have never bought a new Colt 1911. All I have bought was "like new" Colts at a pawn shop.
A Delta Elite for $550 and a Gold Cup for $500, both show room new condition.
Never, I say again, never a problem with them. Son of a guns just keep going on and and on like the energizer bunny. Never a problem.
Maybe because they have never been been modified from factory standards, I don't know though.
I could never afford a $1000 gun for just one gun, and that is why I buy from pawn shops.
JMHO:)
Let's be real..

I am a die hard Colt lover. I Have tons (read 19) of them. I worked in a gunshop for many years, and I have touched and unpackaged, thousands upon thousands of 1911's. The shop I worked, and still work for occassionally, is one of top 5 largest idependent stores in Texas. We move in Volume people. I have seen WW1, WW11, Gunsite models XS, XSE's everything. I have also seen SPR and Kimber in almost as much number. Here are some things I have noticed....
[*]Colt's quality has declined. Period.
[*]If you don't agree with me on that point hold a new base model Colt and an old series 70 base model. Case closed.
[*]Colt is not producing as good of a gun as Kimber. Remember, I have and prefer Colt's, but the truth is the truth.
[*]Finally. Colt's QC sucks! You would not believe the things I have seen from right of the box Colts.
Even with all the problems Kimber has been having recently, when they fix it, and they do fix it, they are better then your Colt's.
Finally, Springfield arms is doing what Colt needs to..it's sink or swim and Springfield is really making strides.
See less See more
That's odd..... I could easily say the exact same thing as you did, only swap the names "Colt" and "Kimber" around.
I was going to say about the same thing dsk said. When it comes to reliability (the most important factor) I've founds Colts to reign supreme among 1911 brands.

Unfortunately, ALL the makers, including the semi-custom makes are producing lemons these days. It seems like much of the time Kimber seems to make no effort to fix their lemons... even with multiple "attempts"... :rolleyes: Spend some time in the Kimber forum... there are LOTS of problems with them. :scratch:
Colt

I presently own only three Colt 1911 pistols. Government, Commander and an Officers. Each 100% reliable. To me Colt pistols are fantastic. I want another. Maybe a WW1 or an 70 Series. Oh and thanks all for the great information on this subject and the whole site for that matter. Will
I've owned Kimber and it needed repair. I've owned Springfield and they needed repair. I have one Baer and it needed repair. I bought my first Colt in 1969, still have it, and it never needed repair. Since then I've purchased several other Colts, the latest being a Colt Defender, still have them and every one of them worked out of the box and never needed repair. I no longer buy any other 1911 except Colt.
ValleyBoy said:
I am a die hard Colt lover. I Have tons (read 19) of them. I worked in a gunshop for many years, and I have touched and unpackaged, thousands upon thousands of 1911's. The shop I worked, and still work for occassionally, is one of top 5 largest idependent stores in Texas. We move in Volume people. I have seen WW1, WW11, Gunsite models XS, XSE's everything. I have also seen SPR and Kimber in almost as much number. Here are some things I have noticed....
[*]Colt's quality has declined. Period.
[*]If you don't agree with me on that point hold a new base model Colt and an old series 70 base model. Case closed.
[*]Colt is not producing as good of a gun as Kimber. Remember, I have and prefer Colt's, but the truth is the truth.
[*]Finally. Colt's QC sucks! You would not believe the things I have seen from right of the box Colts.
Even with all the problems Kimber has been having recently, when they fix it, and they do fix it, they are better then your Colt's.
Finally, Springfield arms is doing what Colt needs to..it's sink or swim and Springfield is really making strides.
Interesting, If that is what you have seen in your area I won't disagree with you. However, [always a however:rolleyes: ] I have not seen the same thing. I will say that Kimbers parts seem to be more uniform, but that is because most of the parts are MIM and easily repeatable. Colt machines much of their small stuff from bar stock, there will be tooling marks on them. However that does not mean the parts are inferior, far from it as I do not consider MIM to be as good as tool steel. Good enough? Maybe. Especially when the pistol is shot 1000 times before selling it off. Good enough to last 50, 60, 70 years? I don't know, guess well find that out in about half a century.:).

Kimbers are pretty nicely finished, I will agree with that, but the finely finished ones are well over 1000 bucks. Most of the sellers are the cheaper models that dont impress me all that much between the paint/finish and the massive sandblasting Kimber seems to do. However that is subjective to what one is looking for, I prefer crisp lines and edges, other prefer mushy rounded edges, if it works, it works.

After many years of shooting 1911s I have come to the conclusion that while Colt needs work on their cosmetics on occasion, they work out of the box a greater percentage of the time them most other brands, and their parts tend to be made of better quality steel. [cept for the MIM extractor fiesco] They last longer, [small parts] and tend to wear out rather then have a catastropic failure. [I mean stress fractures and sheered parts, NOT blow ups].

In the end after owning a bunch of 1911 Colts [from USGI to NM38specials, to Defenders, I have spent the least amount of money on my Colts to keep in good working order then any other make. [sans mags] One make is now on my never going to buy again after multiple problems with their guns [new] that all turned out to be because of cheap garbage parts that either had an extremely short life span, or were junk from new. I wish them luck, but I won't spend any money on them til I see better parts put in them.

As far as pricing goes, In my area Kimber is usually priced above Colt. They have some more doodads but most of the bling is just cast or MIM add on parts. I do like their sights, but SAs are pretty good also. Colt does need to get with it in offering night sights from the factory. They are pretty dumb in that respect. Right now there is a SS Colt defender at the local shop new for 750, they'd probably let it go for 700. A Kimber is about 895 for pretty close to the same thing. 150 bucks more the K is not worth. My defender has been FLAWLESS in reliability since day one. I cannot say that with my other small 1911, it has been a nightmare from day one and everytime I work on it I want to toss it against the wall. I hear more them a few complaints about this gun, but occasionally I do hear of one that runs also. It's nice to see that the company puts out 10 working pistols per 100.:rolleyes: NOT what one wants to see in a CCW self defense pistol to say the least. Cheers.
See less See more
I was stoked to get a Colt (my first) and had my eye on a Custom Shop model before figuring out that no Custom Shop 1911's were certified for sale in Kalifornia. The afternoon I had planned to get one, I read a review by GunTests.com that cited poor feeding of SWC ammo and loose slide clearances amont other problems (like accuracy). In fairness, they praised the handling and 'feel' of the gun.

Never one to trust reviews alone, I went to 3 local dealers, all of whom had a predictably pathetic (small quantity) of Colt product to get my hands on. I did manage to check out 5-6 Colt 1911's (all were new) and was amazed at how they wiggled and rattled compared to every other 1911 I've owned or handled (Springfield, SW1911, Kimber, Les Baer, and Nighthawk Custom). Finish quality was all over the map, but generally pretty poor by modern standards.

I don't doubt that a degree of 'looseness' in tolerances can promote fewer hiccups along various mechanical lines, and Colt's modern 1911's seem to follow this doctrine, to their detriment as far as the broad market is concerned, for which Colt Mfg. seems to care not at all anyway.

It's really too bad - a wonderful brand and a legendary product. It's a shame their best made guns seem to be well behind them. They need a new CEO (another new one that is) and a consumer-focused marketing effort like a bad hangover needs aspirin.

Chrylser, Schwinn, and Harley-Davidson all did it, but Colt Mfg. seems not to be inclined to try.
See less See more
DHart said:
I was going to say about the same thing dsk said. When it comes to reliability (the most important factor) I've founds Colts to reign supreme among 1911 brands.

Unfortunately, ALL the makers, including the semi-custom makes are producing lemons these days. It seems like much of the time Kimber seems to make no effort to fix their lemons... even with multiple "attempts"... :rolleyes: Spend some time in the Kimber forum... there are LOTS of problems with them. :scratch:
I'm a little late in replying, but allow me to say, DHart, that I agree 100% with you. I have had quite a few 1911s over the years ( my downfall in life is I love buying and sellin guns!) and now just have 9 Colts and 1 Luger. I also have found for me, " Colts reign supreme among 1911 brands ".
I have three full-sized Colts (including a new Series 70 from earlier this summer), and one Commander. I actually prefer the Colt rattle. Browning didn't intend for it to be a close-tolerance design, and my own feeling is that a looser 1911 (not TOO loose) is a more reliable gun, all other things being equal.
Poor workmanship is not to be excused, but a little slide rattle is not to be confused with poor workmanship. Colt is one of the few makers that tries to stick closer to the original tolerances, and I don't think I'm the only one who appreciates that. In a defensive pistol, a one-inch gun at 25 yards will give you no practical advantage over a two or three-inch gun at 25 yards, and I'll go with one that shoots through the mud, the blood, and the beer everytime as opposed to a target queen that chokes if the clouds come out. :D
If you want a practice or target piece, then the semi-wad thing could be important to you, but none of my Colts are ever used with semi-wads & I couldn't care less about what they do with them.
Individual preferences & uses. :)
Denis
See less See more
Dpris,

I agree - it's all individual prefs and uses. Perhaps that is why so many 1911 variants are out there and doing well, catering to differing appetites for the same basic design.

My point about Colt wasn't that it's looseness was a manufacturing flaw, but that it was a design decision with the tradeoffs that folks on both sides of this discussion have pointed out.

For me, I want a gun that will put a bullet where I point it, not 3" one way or the other. If people think they might drop their gun in the mud at a critical moment, then getting a looser one is the right priority of operational dependency over absolute accuracy.
I fully agree with DPris... and one doesn't need to make a choice between being 3" off and being mud reliable... the new Colts are quite accurate, perhaps 2" at 25 yards vs. 1" at 25 yards... just a 1" difference that most people couldn't personally achieve anyway without a bench rest... which is not the application most 1911 buyers are looking for. Of course in a moving, dynamic, adrenalin-filled defense scenario such 1" variance in long range precision is ludicrous. Most of us would be arrested for a "defense" shooting at 25 yards... typically defense for a citizen would be done at point blank range up to perhaps 20 feet or so...
I fully agree with DPris... and one doesn't need to make a choice between being 3" off and being mud reliable... the new Colts are quite accurate, perhaps 2" at 25 yards vs. 1" at 25 yards... just a 1" difference that most people couldn't personally achieve anyway without a bench rest... which is not the application most 1911 buyers are looking for. Of course in a moving, dynamic, adrenalin-filled defense scenario such 1" variance in long range precision is ludicrous. Most of us would be arrested for a "defense" shooting at 25 yards... typically defense for a citizen would be done at point blank range up to perhaps 20 feet or so... I gladly give up 1" at 25 YARDS for the reliability, clean or dirty, that the typical Colt 1911's offer.
41 - 60 of 73 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top