So true, govt can't cut out of wet paper bag even when given sharp knives and scissors.AG platkin also was quoted as saying more fear mongering bs like, “ there’s nothing we can do to protect anyone”, ”it is bad constitutional law”, “poorly reasoned decision”.
What a royal toole he is.
He’s as bad a AG Garland in his woke willful ignorance.
They will play it any way that they can and say anything that they think people might believe in order to secure their legitimacy as the ultimate holders of power. This clearly what we are seeing here. They are fighting to retain the supremacy of the State.So true, govt can't cut out of wet paper bag even when given sharp knives and scissors.
So true, and it's why The People can protect themselves as soon as govt gets out of the way.
So true, the idiots referenced by "we" are exactly the idiots nobody wants protecting them.
Here on 1911F, facts matter. There in NJ Govt is where facts don't matter.Protect anyone from who law abiding people? Gotta watch out for those non felon types! It makes you laugh when you hear the stupidity that comes out of Murphy's Gang controlled by the puppet fool himself. I don't dislike the state of NJ I can't stand who runs it.
I couldn’t think of one example of how the state ‘protects’ Us.So true, govt can't cut out of wet paper bag even when given sharp knives and scissors.
So true, and it's why The People can protect themselves as soon as govt gets out of the way.
So true, the idiots referenced by "we" are exactly the idiots nobody wants protecting them.
The state hates us.I couldn’t think of one example of how the state ‘protects’ Us.
Dan said on the podcast stay means it reverts back and to be aware in case it happens. He mentioned that the same criteria is used for a stay that was used for the injunction. Someone gets irreparable damage unless it's done. If it does, the stay would be in effect while the Judge considers the appeal.“If the state gets a Stay, the entire law goes into effect”…I would think the insurance mandate would have to be carved out somehow by the judge since it doesn’t exist; but who knows, either way that (a Stay) would not be good.
I’m going to have to disagree.I still stand by my statement, Pro2A aint won nuttin yet.
I can't say I am totally sure either, but my assumption though it has to be appealed in the Federal courts as it is a indeed a case in the federal courts. I don't know of any federal court btwn district and appellate levels, so where else could it be appealed? I never heard of a case being appealed to a second district judge.I’m not sure which judge gets the first appeal. The third might be a couple appeals away.
