1911Forum banner

1 - 20 of 20 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,459 Posts
No, but I'm curious as to it's speed and what it's close to....fast=Bullseye, medium=Acc#5, slow-Blue Dot...???????

Since the small blurb I saw was referring to it's cleanliness, I'm guessing it's not geared toward lead bullets.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
12,388 Posts
It's listed in the online Hodgdon Reloading Data for 17 common pistol cartridges.

In the data, it is listed between AutoComp and HS6 for burn rate.
When you look at the Hodgdon burn rate chart, AutoComp and HS6
are immediately adjacent to one another with AC a hair slower than HS6.

So CFE Pistol is same burn rate category as HS6, just a teeny bit slower.

Per grain of powder, it gets more velocity than any of the slower powders
in 45acp, 9mmLuger and most others. Good velocity indeed.


When they announced CFE 223 like this, it took them 2 months to ship it
beyond the original availability date.
CFE Pistol is announced to be released December 2013, it may be
a while before we actually see any.

At that burn rate, it will be very interesting as a major PF competition powder.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,459 Posts
It's listed in the online Hodgdon Reloading Data for 17 common pistol cartridges.

In the data, it is listed between AutoComp and HS6 for burn rate.
When you look at the Hodgdon burn rate chart, AutoComp and HS6
are immediately adjacent to one another with AC a hair slower than HS6.

So CFE Pistol is same burn rate category as HS6, just a teeny bit slower.

Per grain of powder, it gets more velocity than any of the slower powders
in 45acp, 9mmLuger and most others. Good velocity indeed.


When they announced CFE 223 like this, it took them 2 months to ship it
beyond the original availability date.
CFE Pistol is announced to be released December 2013, it may be
a while before we actually see any.

At that burn rate, it will be very interesting as a major PF competition powder.


Haven't been able to shoot much for a while, and have waaaaaay to much powder to justify buying any more, but it does look promising, and I wonder how it will stack up for 10MM. Surprised that it listed for lead bullets as well.


I did notice that virtually all the powders on the site used CUP except for the new CFE-Pistol and TiteGroup which used PSI.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
12,388 Posts
I did notice that virtually all the powders on the site used CUP except for the new CFE-Pistol and TiteGroup which used PSI.
That indicates the equipment they used.

Copper crusher equipment from the 1920's to 1950's use copper cylinders,
which don't give a pressure measurement. You just measure how much
it squashed the copper cylinder and then convert that to 'Units' using a chart.
That's where Copper Units Pressure (CUP) comes from.

SAAMI standardized piezo protocol 30 or 40 years ago, just about all
modern pressure equipment works on piezo transducer now,
which is calibrated in true pressure units, PSI.

Since the squash of the copper cylinder depends upon the copper alloy,
the diameter of the hole it sits in, the diameter of the hole in the brass,
and so forth, one cannot convert CUP to PSI. Repeat: Cannot.
Well, I guess you can fool yourself and convert it.
Go knock yourselves out if you wish.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
26 Posts
Interesting. Brings up the subject of Keith's classic load for the .44 Special which produced, according to Keith, 1200 fps at a pressure of .......what? Was this c.u.p. or psi? I once was taken to task for saying that load produced 21,000 lbs. pressure, which was what Keith said it was. Now there are people that say the load was actually 26,000 lbs pressure. Keith had the loads checked with the Peters Cartridge Company sometime before his book was published in 1955 and they verified the pressure at 21,000 lbs. Somehow I can't see Keith running the higher pressure thru those old SAA's. Can someone clear this up? Thanks
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
12,388 Posts
I don't know for sure, jondar. But all the stories and articles written over the years
(not excluding Keith's own tall tales) probably twist and turn the truth until we'd
barely recognize it today.

Some folks get the impression that those guys in the 1930's and 40's developed
cartridges by 'feel' because they simply 'knew' what was right and what wasn't.
But the record shows that Keith and others worked carefully with ballisticians,
engineers, gun manufacturers, and ammo manufacturers to develop new and
better high-performance cartridges.

We would have to dig deeper to determine actual psi for Keith loads.
I bet they have been tested and published with modern equipment
in accordance with SAAMI test standard. You'll have to dig to find it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,459 Posts
Interesting. Brings up the subject of Keith's classic load for the .44 Special which produced, according to Keith, 1200 fps at a pressure of .......what? Was this c.u.p. or psi? I once was taken to task for saying that load produced 21,000 lbs. pressure, which was what Keith said it was. Now there are people that say the load was actually 26,000 lbs pressure. Keith had the loads checked with the Peters Cartridge Company sometime before his book was published in 1955 and they verified the pressure at 21,000 lbs. Somehow I can't see Keith running the higher pressure thru those old SAA's. Can someone clear this up? Thanks
I don't know for sure, jondar. But all the stories and articles written over the years
(not excluding Keith's own tall tales) probably twist and turn the truth until we'd
barely recognize it today.

Some folks get the impression that those guys in the 1930's and 40's developed
cartridges by 'feel' because they simply 'knew' what was right and what wasn't.
But the record shows that Keith and others worked carefully with ballisticians,
engineers, gun manufacturers, and ammo manufacturers to develop new and
better high-performance cartridges.

We would have to dig deeper to determine actual psi for Keith loads.
I bet they have been tested and published with modern equipment
in accordance with SAAMI test standard. You'll have to dig to find it.



I'm not ANY kind of "Keith" expert, but of the few stories I read about some of his load development, He blew up a couple guns/cylinders along the way.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,459 Posts
Haven't been able to shoot much for a while, and have waaaaaay to much powder to justify buying any more, but it does look promising, and I wonder how it will stack up for 10MM. Surprised that it listed for lead bullets as well.


I did notice that virtually all the powders on the site used CUP except for the new CFE-Pistol and TiteGroup which used PSI.


Did a quick check on the 10mm.......Longshot is still a much better choice.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13 Posts
not to bump an old thread, but here goes anyway! My local shop got a load of this in and I bought three pounds today. Loaded up some test loads based off the IMR website and will chrono them later this week.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
12,388 Posts
Thanks, Hero.

(Thread isn't that old. I'm old. This thread isn't.)

Keep us updated. Especially on the smell. CFE223 smells like ammonia when it burns.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
155 Posts
Bought a pound at the Chantilly VA Gun Show this past Friday. Waited an hour and a half in line at a vendor who had lots of powder (amazing!). By the time I got to the front all they had for handguns was CFE Pistol. I bought a pound, as did the two guys in front and in back of me. Will try it out on 45 ACP soon and get back on how it goes, including the smell, Nick.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,164 Posts
I bought some recently and have loaded 230 gr Bayou Bullets and 115 gr Rainier plated 9mm. So far, I like it. It meters very well in my Lee Autodisk, and seems fairly clean. I don't have a chronograph. I used mid-range loads, and it seems as accurate as my old Win 231 loads with similar recoil.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13 Posts
So I shot and chrono'd three loads of CFEP today along with two loads of 700X and SR7625

All loaded with Hornady 230 gr RN with Winchester primers.

My groupings were kinda all over the place as I am still learning the point of impact on my TRP. Seems to be about a 6:00 hold so you will see groupings moving down, lol.

All shot at 15 yards with my Springfield TRP.

CFEP 5.4 gr averaged 712 fps over 5 shots

CFEP 5.7 gr averaged 755 fps over 5 shots

CFEP 6.0 gr averaged 802 fps over 5 shots

700X 4.5 gr averaged 741 fps over 5 shots

700X 4.8 gr averaged 785 fps over 5 shots

SR7625 5.5 gr averaged 721 fps over 5 shots

SR7625 5.8 gr averaged 737 fps over 5 shots

American Eagle factory loads 230 gr RN averaged 824 fps with my chrono fwiw

Pics #1 is CFEP #2 is 700X #3 is Am Eagle, #4 is SR7625

Needless to say I am not the greatest shot but the groupings with the CFEP aren't terrible. Like I said still trying to find POI.

No noticeable ammonia smell that I could detect from the CFEP.

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1398995244.606097.jpg ImageUploadedByTapatalk1398995256.889100.jpg ImageUploadedByTapatalk1398995270.988974.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1398995009.424170.jpg
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
628 Posts
Here's my CFE Pistol data from a 5" 1911, MO Bullet 200 Gr LSWC:

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,996 Posts
I have nothing against new powders from the manufacturers but a copper erasing powder for a handgun? Can't say I've ever had that problem.

I'd rather they concentrate on producing the powder they have now to supply a thirsty market.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
155 Posts
Fired 60 of my reloads using CFE Pistol for the first time two weeks ago: 45ACP, 230grFMJ RN. 20 loads of 6.0 gr, 20 of 6.4, and 20 of 6.8, which covers the range from low to high in the load charts.

No failures, no odd smell. All were acceptable in accuracy, with the 6.4gr loads being the most accurate...for what it's worth in a small experiment of this nature.

Also, it seemed the pistol wasn't as dirty as when I fire the same amount of Federal or Winchester. Subjective judgment, but I'm the guy who cleans it after every trip to the range so it should have at least a little merit.

I'm good to go with CFE Pistol.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13 Posts
strange I found mine was particularly dirty, but then again I did have 50 rounds of American Eagle through it too. That is not the cleanest burn. Likewise I have no issues with it and the groupings I got were enough to please me.

Interesting side note. I loaded Hornady 200 Gr XTP at 1.22". The IMR website has the COL at 1.15" which came out with the bullet buried way past the shoulder and into the ogive.
 
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
Top