End of California's hand gun roster?

And the Courts circle jerk will continue. As Usual.

This will be appealed to the 9th Circus…the judge gave them 14 days to file. Our idiot AG has already come out and said they will fight this and my bet is that it may be awhile before actual goodness (freedom) happens.

They can still drag it out for several years. They will continue to waste taxpayer money defending their list.

They can't waste a dime, swinging from overpasses & lampposts.. They can't even do much to offend, (other than the sense of smell).

Which runs out first: our patience or our fiat-money?

Well as soon as they start giving out reparation money to all of the black people, they will go broke fast. They have to raise taxes on everyone and everything to pay for it. A major increase not some modest tax increase either. As soon as these people get their money maybe 40% of it or more is state, federal, county and city income taxes. They are going to love that.

Communists will stop at nothing to prolong their endless wrath.

Tarmy said:

Our idiot AG has already come out and said they will fight this and my bet is that it may be awhile before actual goodness (freedom) happens.

Click to expand...

The risk that Bonta is taking is that their loss in court may result in the roster itself, not just some provisions, be thrown out. Right now they still have it, they still have drop testing reqs, they still are charging testing and renewal fees. If I were them and wanted to be sure to keep the roster and the remaining controls it gives them, hoping to re-expand at the opportune moment, I would think twice before deciding on a challenge.

YVK said:

The risk that Bonta is taking is that their loss in court may result in the roster itself, not just some provisions, be thrown out. Right now they still have it, they still have drop testing reqs, they still are charging testing and renewal fees. If I were them and wanted to be sure to keep the roster and the remaining controls it gives them, hoping to re-expand at the opportune moment, I would think twice before deciding on a challenge.

Click to expand...

think twice? how about think at all.

YVK said:

The risk that Bonta is taking is that their loss in court may result in the roster itself, not just some provisions, be thrown out. Right now they still have it, they still have drop testing reqs, they still are charging testing and renewal fees. If I were them and wanted to be sure to keep the roster and the remaining controls it gives them, hoping to re-expand at the opportune moment, I would think twice before deciding on a challenge.

Click to expand...

That can't be done, it would require two attributes the leftist Dem's don't have:
1) the ability to think rationally
2) the ability to realize that they are wrong and gracefully admit/accept the correct course of action.

In all honesty, this isn't even a set back for Cali leftists. They will get a stay and a review in their 9th circus. The Cali dept. of Jokes will bury the court in briefs and BS. The circus will set a review date out as far as humanly possible. The proponents will appeal and the circus will punt to the 2nd. Those clowns will uphold the stays without hearings and we will wait for the Supremes docket to pick it up. Bruen II coming to a court near somebody in 2030... Even if they win do you think Cali is going be less obtuse than NY?? I can easily see Cali giving the finger to the Supremes.

Is this the same story as the thread topic?

Mon, March 20, 2023 at 1:35 PM MST

By Brendan Pierson
(Reuters) -A federal judge on Monday blocked California from enforcing a state law requiring new semiautomatic handguns to have certain safety features, finding it violates the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Click to expand...

they will abolish daylight saving time before this is ratified

Very few things in this world are as disgusting as California politicians and gun laws.

YVK said:

The risk that Bonta is taking is that their loss in court may result in the roster itself, not just some provisions, be thrown out. Right now they still have it, they still have drop testing reqs, they still are charging testing and renewal fees. If I were them and wanted to be sure to keep the roster and the remaining controls it gives them, hoping to re-expand at the opportune moment, I would think twice before deciding on a challenge.

Click to expand...

They may have come to this conclusion. As of Friday the state had not appealed the decision yet. This is odd because if they were going to appeal, they generally would have done it the very next day. There could be a legit reason why they haven't, of course, and they still obviously could.

The other side of this, however, is that the roster itself will likely be overturned in its entirety as a result of Bruen. So they're going to lose it anyway but it may take a bit longer.

I think the state won't appeal and they'll hedge their bets on the other case Renna v. Bonta which seeks to remove the roster in its entirety. With what's left of the roster(just drop test and live fire) the State still maintains an aspect of control and that's what it's always been about, control. We still can't buy discontinued but non C&R handguns because they won't be on the roster, nor will we be able to "legally" manufacturer handguns so long as any part of the roster exists.

Sent from my Pixel 6a using Tapatalk