Joined
·
259 Posts
Ex-extractor vs In-extractor w/pics
My Kimber Stainless TLE II will soon be on it's way back to Kimber for repair!:mummy:
Before the first ship back I had numerous fail to extract, some fail to feed and several fail to eject! Kimber replaced the ex-extractor, reamed and polished the chamber, and fixed a few other minor problems not related to the function problems. Kimber paid the freight without my even asking, then as now.
When my Kimber worked (some of the time) it would feed all different bullet shapes so the fedding problems are not ammo related.
Upon getting my Kimber back I went out to shoot it with 100 rounds of UMC ball. It is my thought that a 1911 should feed ball 100% of the time.
Picture 1 two slides:
The Springfield is a WW II model.
Picture 2:
In pic 2 at arrow "A" there is a part of the slide that protects the bottom of the extractor, arrow "B" shows this part milled away (it came from factory this way:scratch: ) and the sharp edge of the extractor.
Now I'm not an engineer, nor am I a 'smith but it seems to me that with a little bit of contouring that this Kimber can be made to perform without malfunction. IMHO the problem with Kimber's ex-ext. is not one of the fact that it is externally mounted but that it is just an extremely poorly executed implementation of the design. If the sharp edge were radiused and perhaps if the nose were shaped differntly ans smoothed I think it would function without flaw.
Hopefully Kimber will make it work this time! Those that have had gunsmiths fix their Kimbers with the ex-ext. vs shipping it back to Kimber is this what fixed yours? The removal of the sharp edges.
My Kimber Stainless TLE II will soon be on it's way back to Kimber for repair!:mummy:
Before the first ship back I had numerous fail to extract, some fail to feed and several fail to eject! Kimber replaced the ex-extractor, reamed and polished the chamber, and fixed a few other minor problems not related to the function problems. Kimber paid the freight without my even asking, then as now.
When my Kimber worked (some of the time) it would feed all different bullet shapes so the fedding problems are not ammo related.
Upon getting my Kimber back I went out to shoot it with 100 rounds of UMC ball. It is my thought that a 1911 should feed ball 100% of the time.
Picture 1 two slides:

The Springfield is a WW II model.
Picture 2:

In pic 2 at arrow "A" there is a part of the slide that protects the bottom of the extractor, arrow "B" shows this part milled away (it came from factory this way:scratch: ) and the sharp edge of the extractor.
Now I'm not an engineer, nor am I a 'smith but it seems to me that with a little bit of contouring that this Kimber can be made to perform without malfunction. IMHO the problem with Kimber's ex-ext. is not one of the fact that it is externally mounted but that it is just an extremely poorly executed implementation of the design. If the sharp edge were radiused and perhaps if the nose were shaped differntly ans smoothed I think it would function without flaw.
Hopefully Kimber will make it work this time! Those that have had gunsmiths fix their Kimbers with the ex-ext. vs shipping it back to Kimber is this what fixed yours? The removal of the sharp edges.