Excellent stuff----I always enjoy Gabe's stuff.
Bill
Bill
All your isoceles are belong to us!!!Originally posted by Mall Ninja:
Shane, me lad,
re: "Now I shoot Modern isoceles after some instruction from Matt Burkett at the 98 Aware Match and have improved further still. "
Does this mean that you disagree with Gabe?![]()
Now you are talking about target shooting right? I would think if you are engaging multiple threats (real life BG's, not IDPA targets) you might want to be MOVING! And moving requires you to change your foot positions, which would say that a strict ISO might not be right. I am sure it is better when standing and shooting down range at targets.Originally posted by shane45-1911:
It is the BEST for recoil control/shot recovery, and it allows the hips and pelvis to rotate a larger arc to cover multiple threats without changing foot positioning.
It is an awkward postion for a die-hard Weaver user to get accustomed to, but it really has no equal for most situations.
[This message has been edited by shane45-1911 (edited 08-09-2001).]
Yes, while originally used for target work, this "posture" has significant real-world advantages as well, should one find himself with the luxury of being able to use this style AFTER finding cover or tactical positioning.Originally posted by BillD:
Now you are talking about target shooting right? I would think if you are engaging multiple threats (real life BG's, not IDPA targets) you might want to be MOVING!
Actually Shane, if you look above somewhere, I did make a post that mentions that I agree with most things that Gabe says. I believe that Mall Ninja was actually responding to MY post!Originally posted by shane45:
Mall Ninja, I re-read your post and I think you may be mixing me up with shane45-1911. The "I'm surprised given your work" part is what tipped me off that the 2 shanes syndrome has struck again. hehehAlthough I sure would love to go work with the Canadian Shane as an agent!!!![]()