1911Forum banner

1 - 13 of 13 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,851 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
As a firearms expert providing expert testimony in criminal and civil cases involving firearms, especially the 80% receivers, he is creating a problem for prosecutors. He has helped get cases dismissed against defendants regarding blank AR receivers. Claims the government has been misinterpreting the law for 50 years with respect to AR15's and the definition of a receiver.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/07/us/ex-atf-agent-ar-15/index.html
... O'Kelly is using his formidable firearms expertise and institutional knowledge of the ATF to take aim at his former employer.

He's at the center of a brewing legal dispute that federal prosecutors say has the potential to upend the 1968 Gun Control Act and "seriously undermine the ATF's ability to trace and regulate firearms nationwide."
and

In December, a federal judge in Ohio dismissed weapons-related charges against two men after O'Kelly testified that the AR-15 part at issue in their case was not subject to federal law or regulation.
File this under the 'inconvenient truth' folder. ;)
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,683 Posts
Go man go!!!

Sounds way to good to ever happen plus he better cover his six because he’s messing with the REAL gangsters. The mafia of the biggest crime family in the world. He’s liable to end up going on a perminant vacation on Epsteen island
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,012 Posts
I've always wondered how it is the lower on a FAL isn't "the gun" and the "upper" is but on an AR it is the opposite. Same regarding a Ruger Standard and a Luger. I don't know what the upshot of all this is. I have about 6 AR lowers and a dozen uppers. There seems a lot more variety of uppers. Would they become "the gun"?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,056 Posts
There's a chance this guy could screw us, and give us serialized uppers AND lowers, or at least serialized uppers. The worst case could be a mandate for the upper to match the lower. Don't celebrate yet...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,191 Posts
There's a chance this guy could screw us, and give us serialized uppers AND lowers, or at least serialized uppers. The worst case could be a mandate for the upper to match the lower. Don't celebrate yet...
That was my thought. Where you could have a nice lower with your nice custom trigger and stock of choice and could order a couple of uppers tailored to different purposes straight to your door, it could end up as you said. Each upper or each upper/lower combo could end up being considered the firearm.

While it takes the upper to chamber a round and direct it after launch, the lower is still the part that acts as the go switch.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,851 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
There's a chance this guy could screw us, and give us serialized uppers AND lowers, or at least serialized uppers. The worst case could be a mandate for the upper to match the lower. Don't celebrate yet...
I was thinking the same. Some European made pistols I own, bear the same serial number everywhere... barrel, slide and frame.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,304 Posts
At least a former ATF agent actually knows what the laws are. The laws are so confusing, the damn atf don't even know what they are. I called my local office for a question once, and they didn't even know the answer. I can't even remember what it was about now, but anyway, they're a joke.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,197 Posts
The field officers are just basic paper pushers. The decision makers are part of the swamp...
Joe
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,703 Posts
There's a chance this guy could screw us, and give us serialized uppers AND lowers, or at least serialized uppers. The worst case could be a mandate for the upper to match the lower. Don't celebrate yet...
Yeah, that’s next.........
Meanwhile, I’m gonna find a way to jamb an AR upper onto a FAL lower. I will send them by USPS to anyone that wants to buy one! :eek:
That’ll show em’...
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,851 Posts
Discussion Starter #11
yes, I am wondering about that classic phrase, "Be careful what you wish for, it may come true."
There are (according to the BATFE) some 423 million firearms in circulation since the 1986 modification to the 1968 GCA. Which means most of the semi auto pistols and modular rifles manufactured in the past 50 years only have one part serialized, the frame/receiver as we traditionally define it.

So it's going to be difficult to pass a new law requiring all the parts that make the firearm functional to be serialized because of the volume of guns out there that were serialized to the old interpretation. They could change the law which would then have to grandfather in the old guns.

Nevertheless, more hassle, more chances to run into a snafu.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
5,364 Posts
At least a former ATF agent actually knows what the laws are. The laws are so confusing, the damn atf don't even know what they are. I called my local office for a question once, and they didn't even know the answer. I can't even remember what it was about now, but anyway, they're a joke.
It appears that the BATFE Regulations do not agree with teh Federal Law.
Far from the first time Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) has not matched with Federal Code.
Code usually wins after much wrangling.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
11,450 Posts
At least a former ATF agent actually knows what the laws are. The laws are so confusing, the damn atf don't even know what they are. I called my local office for a question once, and they didn't even know the answer. I can't even remember what it was about now, but anyway, they're a joke.
ATFE is about the bottom rung of the Federal LE, not exactly the best and brightest. I've spoken to the NFA Branch in WV a couple times.... called with a question, don't remember what specific. Recieved a less than confident answer. Called again the next day, spoke to someone different, asking the same question. Whas confidently given an answer that directly contradicted what I'd been told the day before....

Someone mentioned serialized parts- this is a carry over from the days when parts were hand fit. Guns produced on a very large scale (particularly in Europe, where a greater degree of precision is the expected norm) serialized all of the parts, because they weren't always fully interchangeable. The tolerance stacking from a large number of small, hand fit parts could quickly render a piston non functional.
 
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Top