I have been reading these posts for awhile now. Very interesting and informative. The base of knowledge here is impressive to say the least.
I have built a couple of my own pistols. I have done slide to frame fits and usually end up with .0015" to .0025" of dial indicator or feeler gauge measured movement between the slide and frame WITHOUT any other parts installed. Of course the barrel fit removes the rest of that movement. And these pistols shoot very very well. My question is...how does this compare to the "no movement between the slide and frame" one reads about in the magazines. I never had the opportunity to handle a Baer or comparable gun let alone strip it and check the slide frame fit. I know it is not that overly important to have "no perceptible movement" but am curious as what the frame to slide fit is in these highly touted pistols.
Thank you.
I have built a couple of my own pistols. I have done slide to frame fits and usually end up with .0015" to .0025" of dial indicator or feeler gauge measured movement between the slide and frame WITHOUT any other parts installed. Of course the barrel fit removes the rest of that movement. And these pistols shoot very very well. My question is...how does this compare to the "no movement between the slide and frame" one reads about in the magazines. I never had the opportunity to handle a Baer or comparable gun let alone strip it and check the slide frame fit. I know it is not that overly important to have "no perceptible movement" but am curious as what the frame to slide fit is in these highly touted pistols.
Thank you.