Joined
·
6 Posts
Ok, I've looked at manufactuer's websites for a while now and was considering a Para LDA until a local smith told me that the trigger mechs were no good. So I thought about springfield. They make pistols for the FBI, must be great. Then I see the 5 pics of springfields with half of the slide blown off. No thanks. So I see much fewer complaints about kimber than the others, so I'm probably going with them.
Now, should it be a classic stainless or a pro carry II stainless? I'm not too concearned with concealment. I do want to become proficient with the pistol and will sign up for concealed carry classes. My question is are these two pistols comparable to each other? If I really get into this and decide to try some local competitions will one of the pistols leave me at a disadvantage? Also, are my assumptions correct about the quality of the other manufacuters? The reason I ask is I really want 3 dot sights, which the kimber does not come with, but the para and the springfield do.
Thanks for your help
Allen
Now, should it be a classic stainless or a pro carry II stainless? I'm not too concearned with concealment. I do want to become proficient with the pistol and will sign up for concealed carry classes. My question is are these two pistols comparable to each other? If I really get into this and decide to try some local competitions will one of the pistols leave me at a disadvantage? Also, are my assumptions correct about the quality of the other manufacuters? The reason I ask is I really want 3 dot sights, which the kimber does not come with, but the para and the springfield do.
Thanks for your help
Allen