I keep running into posts where the member states that he likes having the gun designed for the round, namely the 1911. I then ran accross some historical references of the 1911. In them they state the 1911 was a rechambering of JMB's earlier .38 caliber pistols to accept .45 What gives?
[This message has been edited by BKC45ACP (edited 11-04-2001).]
Nagative ghostrider the 1911 was an improvement of the .45ACP 1905 for military acceptance. So you are victorious over your foe much like the ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS!
Yes, neat little guns. All three of them. There is probably not enough money in it for a manufacturer to tool up for one, but wouldn't that be great in .38 and .40? I was shooting my Gov't .380 in a BUG match Saturday and there is a lot to say for a gun in a familar action but scaled to the caliber.
BBBill
My reading indicates that the 9.8mm Colt was a Hartford Colt development and the 9.65mm Gran Browning was a separate FN project - not the same caliber or gun. So I don't see FN making 9.8 Colts when they had a similar product of their own in the works. But they did have the European rights to Browning designs, so maybe they would have.
It is interesting to calculate that 9.8mm = .3858" and that the hollowbase inside lube bullets for .41 LC are .386". Does anybody know the actual caliber of the 1902 .41 ACP or the later .41 Special? Also 9.65mm = .3799", a true .38 cal.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could
be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
1911Forum
A forum community dedicated to all 1911 firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!