1911Forum banner

Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 20 of 48 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
608 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)
While of course there's no stopping anybody from posting anything (except where violating forum rules, then mods take care of it) my thought for this is to be a concise place for clear proofs, not just suggestive evidence, of the mass election fraud, which incidentally cannot be done by one person, and also is by its nature criminal, and therefore is criminal conspiracy.

Why such a thread? Because I suppose it's remotely possible that some are actually unaware that mass criminal election fraud is thoroughly demonstrated, rather than there being "no evidence" or "little evidence" as the complicit-in-sedition media claim; or that some know people that are in that state of unawareness yet have open minds able to process information and who might appreciate having it. (Rather than already being brainwashed to where they cannot process true information, which is an all-too-common state due to decades of Marxist infiltration and indoctrination.)

A first entry, that in Michigan the machines physically cannot generate votes at the rate the Dem-controlled Michigan criminal fraud would require:

598669


598670


 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
510 Posts
Thank-you for posting this.

Alex Jones stated that Google experienced a massive spike in searches on what the prison time would be for official voter fraud, just prior to the election.

Some officials concerned about the marching orders they were given,
and the dirty money they took?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
608 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
I would like to add that a number of sources besides Jones reported that also. It appears to be fact.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
608 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
598673


598675


Observe in the second fraudulent data set, which is out of Pennsylvania, in batch after batch the alleged Biden/Trump ratio is absolutely identical every time, to the last decimal place. Is that a property of real votes, batches do come in repeatedly at absolutely identical ratio, or of a computer holding to a pre-programmed value?

Also observe the "nice" fact that, for example in the very first entry, there are "3,295,187.97" votes for Biden. Do you think people cast fractional votes, or do computers generate fractional numbers prior to getting to the rounding step?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
608 Posts
Discussion Starter #5 (Edited)
Good article, though more from the reasoning perspective than from hard data: What We Must Believe to Believe Biden Won - Frontpagemag

An excerpt:

In the end, to accept Joe Biden as our legitimate Chief Executive, we must believe the voters hammered the Democrats in congressional, state, and local elections, yet decided to elect the “leader” of their party president. We must believe that he dramatically underperformed among minority voters, yet received 10 million more votes than Barack Obama. We must believe that virtually all of the reliable election bellwethers were wrong. We must believe that all of the elections in the swing states were conducted honestly and that the Venezuelan software used to tabulate the votes was secure.
What the author is referring to with bellwethers includes such as Trump winning by an average of 16 points among the 17 counties that have been extremely consistent in accurately predicting the Presidential election since 1960. Trump won 16 of these counties, as well as having that gigantic average 16 point margin. We could add to it such as Florida and Ohio being more than indicative of how elections are going to go, and Trump winning both easily yet supposedly losing the election.
598679

In other words, fake polls aside, Trump would reasonably be expected from this to have won by about 16: that is, about 58:42 not accounting for third-party. He very plausibly did. As mentioned, it's pretty implausible Biden's alleged 10 million votes past Obama 2008 or Clinton 2016 were actually for him. Some were absolutely fake, others were stolen from Trump. Vote switches are proven (perhaps a later post.)

Bellwethers don't prove, but when there's a ton of things not remotely matching up, only a fool doesn't look further. You start looking at means, motive, and opportunity, and if you have hard evidence on top of that, there it is.

Means? Check (Dominion software as well as the no-signature-verification, no ID required, mail-out-by-the-millions unrequested ballots, and preventing observing of counts.) Motive? Loudly proclaimed over the last 4 years. Opportunity? See previous. Smoking guns? See above, and there are more.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,498 Posts
Thank-you for posting this.

Alex Jones stated that Google experienced a massive spike in searches on what the prison time would be for official voter fraud, just prior to the election.

Some officials concerned about the marching orders they were given,
and the dirty money they took?
If this is actually true, and with Alex Jones you never know, it still isn't clear proof or evidence of the fraud.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,114 Posts
Like I said;
IT'S NOT GOING TO MATTER, THERE ARE FORCES MUCH GREATER THAN TRUMP AT THE TOP PULLING THE STRINGS.
It's all about the "New World Order"
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,394 Posts
Link to today’s press conference in its entirety here.

And yes, I believe that The President’s legal team has uncovered incontrovertible proof of criminality and election fraud; enough to ensure that Crooked Joe Biden will not be inaugurated in January.

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,394 Posts
Still more excellent news; this time from Arizona....


Arizona Governor Won’t Accept Election Results Until All Lawsuits Are Settled
November 19, 2020 10:17, Last Updated: November 19, 2020 13:41
By Jack Phillips

Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey announced the state’s election isn’t over until all court cases have been settled, as the Trump campaign and state GOPfiled lawsuits in Maricopa County in a bid to block officials from certifying the election results due to alleged voter irregularities and improprieties.


Arizona Governor Won't Accept Election Results Until All Lawsuits Are Settled
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,539 Posts
MSM and Big Tech stole the soap box. Together with the Ds stole the ballot box. We have a broader meaning of the jury box remaining in order to recover both.

Obviously they are trying to steal the jury box too. And that's why the huge weeping, moaning and gnashing of teeth over Justice Barrett: fearing she's a security measure on the jury box that they didn't expect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oldsalt65

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
510 Posts
Like I said;
IT'S NOT GOING TO MATTER, THERE ARE FORCES MUCH GREATER THAN TRUMP AT THE TOP PULLING THE STRINGS.
It's all about the "New World Order"
Absolutely.
And back in 1776,
a colonist was up on the Musket.com Forum,
and he typed:
"IT'S NOT GOING TO MATTER, THERE ARE FORCES MUCH GREATER THAN PAUL REVERE AT THE TOP PULLING THE STRINGS.
It's all about the "British Empire""

I for one, am very happy that Paul Revere, while an esteemed and well respected member of the Musket.com Forum,
Defriended that colonist, and made his now famous ride anyway.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,114 Posts
It'll never be a Civil war. We are not discontent with our fellow man's race, creed, color or religion.
It would be a Class war, it's all about the top 1% wanting to control the 99% and that will never abide.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,114 Posts
Absolutely.
And back in 1776,
a colonist was up on the Musket.com Forum,
and he typed:
"IT'S NOT GOING TO MATTER, THERE ARE FORCES MUCH GREATER THAN PAUL REVERE AT THE TOP PULLING THE STRINGS.
It's all about the "British Empire""

I for one, am very happy that Paul Revere, while an esteemed and well respected member of the Musket.com Forum,
Defriended that colonist, and made his now famous ride anyway.
We are in the way of "The New World Order." A "One World Economy" as predicted in Revelations, its coming and WILL eventually happen. However, God has given us the power of free will and therefore the ability to change when it does, it's really up to us I believe.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
510 Posts
We are in the way of "The New World Order." A "One World Economy" as predicted in Revelations, its coming and WILL eventually happen. However, God has given us the power of free will and therefore the ability to change when it does, it's really up to us I believe.
Okay.
So what do you envision life in America as by 2030
with Biden 2020?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
608 Posts
Discussion Starter #19
Video capture: Watch: Fatal Media Mistake, Live Evidence Of “SCORECARD” And “HAMMER” Switching Votes To Biden

At 0:04, you can see that the stream was reporting Trump 1,690,589 and Biden 1,252,537 in PA.

At 0:40, after cycling through some other states, we return to PA again and it is Trump 1,670,631 (which is less than 36 seconds previously, how does that happen if it's simple, direct, honest electronic stream?) and Biden 1,272,495.

Hmm, how many votes did Trump somehow -- I mean, people don't cast negative votes -- lose? 19,958. (Feel free to check the calculation.)

Care to guess how many Biden gained as of 36 seconds later?

Aw, you guessed it!

How ever did you guess?

The same 19,958.

Exactly why has no one been handcuffed yet?

And exactly why are so many claiming "no evidence" or "little evidence" of fraud?

This is not an isolated example above.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
608 Posts
Discussion Starter #20 (Edited)
Very good writeup, but if sufficiently interested, you'd have to register https://www.israpundit.org/caught-e...eft-with-heavy-fraud-focused-on-swing-states/

Briefly, the NY Times data stream was analyzed and every point was found where Trump mysteriously had (supposedly) fewer votes in a state than he had a moment before, while Biden scored a nice gain, often the exact same amount.

"Switched votes" are where Trump votes became Biden votes, or at least "coincidentally" Biden in an instant gains exactly what Trump lost.

"Lost votes" are where Trump, well, lost votes compared to the moment before, but Biden didn't gain that number:

Dominion Voting Systems :

Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248

New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20
Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456
Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882
New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213
Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574
Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102
Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023
California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989
Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0
Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650
Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0
Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0
Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730
Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408
Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0
Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0
New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116
Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477
New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610
Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730
Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.

Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557
Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154

Election Systems & Software :

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849
Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748
South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119
Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276
South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1
North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681
Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0
North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15
District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Unknown Systems:

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272
Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51
Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0
Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408
Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0
Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35
Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13
West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300
Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0
Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

And if you'd like to see election maps showing where fraud has been detected and where detected (as above) voter fraud has been corrected for, see https://everylegalvote.com/country .

598720



Not that maps prove anything, the facts do, but people do well with visuals sometimes.

If the media were honest, the maps they were showing would be as above. What a change in narrative that would be, eh? And it's absolutely accurate. The orange-colored states are indeed in dispute due to detected fraud. It's a fact.

And btw, contrary to common opinion, to be in the lead for Electoral votes Trump doesn't need to be awarded a single state where there is such evidence of mass fraud. If the SC ruled to bar states having fraudulent elections, as proven beyond reasonable doubt, from sending Electors for the party benefited by the fraud, and Trump still didn't get a single Elector from those states he won in terms of real votes but the D election officials refused to certify, he'd win 232 - 214.

You always hear about needing 270, including in the above map, but the Constitution does not specify 270. It goes to the House when it's a minority of Electors and so far as I know that would be legal Electors, which is not necessarily 539. I hope there's a legal analysis elsewhere of that. However, what triggers going to the House is not a major note of this post, but a side note. A lot of people think Trump is behind if the fraud states were invalidated rather than awarded to him, but that's not the case.

All the above is correcting only for electronic fraud.
 
1 - 20 of 48 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top