Hello folks,
I'm pondering one of these two 1911s (it has no dedicated purpose right now) and want to know people's thoughts.
Pros of S&W:
1. Very well dehorned (have the blue, slick-slide version).
2. Cheaper ($700 vs $1000 approximately).
3. Smith is on a roll lately.
4. Undercut trigger guard (feels really good).
Cons of S&W:
1. Strange gap under sight.
2. FPS (it can come out though right?).
3. Front cocking serrations (tolerable on full-size, yucky on commander)
Pros of Springer:
1. Finish (though I'm not thrilled about the green).
2. Smooth front strap (TRP almost caused blood loss with its checkering).
3. Can takes lots of shooting since it's heavy.
Cons of Springer:
1. Expensive.
2. Springers used to be super-sharp...how's their dehorning lately?
3. Have no real use for ambi-safeties
4. Is this gun competition legal in IDPA/IPSC with it's weight?
Both of these companies have good reputations for customer service, so I should be ok on that front. I'm partly tempted to wait and see what Smith comes out with later in the year (rumored rail gun, I'm hoping for a commander w/o FCS). I've very concerned with the springer being sharp, that's a huge pet peeve of mine, however the TRP in the shop was pretty decent, much to my surprise...though the checkering was horrible (pain wise, not quality wise)...I can't imagine it being pleasant to shoot.
And, needless to say...pics have great influence on me...
Thanks...
Howard
I'm pondering one of these two 1911s (it has no dedicated purpose right now) and want to know people's thoughts.
Pros of S&W:
1. Very well dehorned (have the blue, slick-slide version).
2. Cheaper ($700 vs $1000 approximately).
3. Smith is on a roll lately.
4. Undercut trigger guard (feels really good).
Cons of S&W:
1. Strange gap under sight.
2. FPS (it can come out though right?).
3. Front cocking serrations (tolerable on full-size, yucky on commander)
Pros of Springer:
1. Finish (though I'm not thrilled about the green).
2. Smooth front strap (TRP almost caused blood loss with its checkering).
3. Can takes lots of shooting since it's heavy.
Cons of Springer:
1. Expensive.
2. Springers used to be super-sharp...how's their dehorning lately?
3. Have no real use for ambi-safeties
4. Is this gun competition legal in IDPA/IPSC with it's weight?
Both of these companies have good reputations for customer service, so I should be ok on that front. I'm partly tempted to wait and see what Smith comes out with later in the year (rumored rail gun, I'm hoping for a commander w/o FCS). I've very concerned with the springer being sharp, that's a huge pet peeve of mine, however the TRP in the shop was pretty decent, much to my surprise...though the checkering was horrible (pain wise, not quality wise)...I can't imagine it being pleasant to shoot.
And, needless to say...pics have great influence on me...
Thanks...
Howard