That looks like a Trijicon RMR on there. It'll hold up just fine.I'll hazard a guess that 10 mm + long slide + RMR has never been done before. Interesting how rmr is going to hold up.
Ed Brown has been selling them for several years. I do not anticipate that the RMR will not hold up. Interestingly enough, Ed brown had actually stopped offering the LS-10 early this year. Due to lack of sales according to what they told me. However more recently they appear to have resurrected it as I got a promotional e-mail from them recently that advertised it as being available.I'll hazard a guess that 10 mm + long slide + RMR has never been done before. Interesting how rmr is going to hold up.
Methinks that would indicate that there hasn't been too many of them RMR'd out there to have a large enough sample. This is 10 mm coming out with a higher velocity from a 6 inch barrel so your RMR will see a little more battering than what they see on G19s, for example. People did break them on 9 mm guns, and yours truly broke an SRO on a CZ. I do think that it will likely hold, but I also think that this isn't going to be a high volume / high rate of use gun, right? At any rate, it would be an interesting data piece.Ed Brown has been selling them for several years... Ed brown had actually stopped offering the LS-10 early this year. Due to lack of sales according to what they told me.
Ed Brown products told me that they were not big sellers. Perhaps they will see more battering. But you are talking about a pretty beefy gun so that is questionable. A Glock 19 probably weighs about half of what this gun does. Not sure if I buy into this higher rate of battering of which you speak. Ed brown also stated that they have never sold a lot of them. So yes your statement regarding a sample size is correct. And equally that for a 4,500$ gun there likely are not thousands of them out there for sampling as you say.Methinks that would indicate that there hasn't been too many of them RMR'd out there to have a large enough sample. This is 10 mm coming out with a higher velocity from a 6 inch barrel so your RMR will see a little more battering than what they see on G19s, for example. People did break them on 9 mm guns, and yours truly broke an SRO on a CZ. I do think that it will likely hold, but I also think that this isn't going to be a high volume / high rate of use gun, right? At any rate, it would be an interesting data piece.
I dunno if it is the same. Slugs obviously recoil harder but the optic itself is stationary and non-reciprocating.If it fails because it can't handle the recoil abuse, I'm going to suggest a Holosun. If they can survive sitting atop a Mossberg 940 your pistol shouldn't be a problem.
Good point i suppose, there might be a disparity in force/shock between a reciprocating slide with a hard stop at the rear and a reciprocating gun with a spongy stop in someone's shoulder. And I suppose it's going to be hard to sort out beyond an educated guess which is more abusive. Crying shame Mossberg probably won't give us the down low on what they tried and how it fared when they were playing with the 940 optic cuts to say the Holosun fared best.I dunno if it is the same. Slugs obviously recoil harder but the optic itself is stationary and non-reciprocating.
I'd go with RMR on such project.
Correct, but you are still looking at a serious impact. I would venture to guess that it would be substantially higher than what the Glock 19 slide might be subject to that to that you referred to earlier.I dunno if it is the same. Slugs obviously recoil harder but the optic itself is stationary and non-reciprocating.
I'd go with RMR on such project.
Yes but there are other factors. Shotties are heavier. On pistols optic is in line with recoiling part as it moves, on shotgun optic sits above the path of bolt's travel.Correct, but you are still looking at a serious impact. I would venture to guess that it would be substantially higher than what the Glock 19 slide might be subject to that to that you referred to earlier.