I know that this question has been brought up before but for those of you that son't mind let's rehash it.
Here is my problem. Well my first problem is that I can't carry concealed here in the state of MO. Besides that I have been thinking of a carry gun for quite some time. Just in the anticipation that the law will pass. I want to already have the gun and be familiar with it, make sure that it is comfortable and concelable.
I can't decide on what I want. I have swayed from gun to gun for several months now.
I have though about my Wilson Protector. It's biggest plus is also it's biggest minus. It is a full size gun. This making it easy to shoot yet harder to conceal. I feel most comfortable with a full size .45 protecting my life.
I have thought about the Wilson KZ-45 Compact. But does losing 3/4" to 1" in barrel length make it that much easier to conceal? Right now this may be the direction I am leaning.
I have though about the new Para-Ordnance LLDA 6-45.
I have thought about my Glock 23. Caliber wise this is my second choice. It can be argued that the .40 performs a little better out of the shorter barrel.
Then I have thought about either a Kel-Tech or Kahr. Would be much easier to conceal and I could live with a 9mm in a pinch.
Body wise. I am 6'5" 235lbs. I know that some of you guys that are much smaller carry full sized 1911's with no problem. But honestly are you able to carry them comfortably and able to conceal them properly? I know that the right clothing and so on are a major part of concealment. But I guess know matter what you carry you are going to have to have an untucked shirt or jacket or something so why not then just go with the bigger gun. I would want to be able to carry one gun 90% of the time. So what do you think? Also once again is a Officer sized gun that much easier to conceal than a government sized gun?
Thanks
------------------
"Of those that will penetrate, the edge is always with the bigger bullet."
Here is my problem. Well my first problem is that I can't carry concealed here in the state of MO. Besides that I have been thinking of a carry gun for quite some time. Just in the anticipation that the law will pass. I want to already have the gun and be familiar with it, make sure that it is comfortable and concelable.
I can't decide on what I want. I have swayed from gun to gun for several months now.
I have though about my Wilson Protector. It's biggest plus is also it's biggest minus. It is a full size gun. This making it easy to shoot yet harder to conceal. I feel most comfortable with a full size .45 protecting my life.
I have thought about the Wilson KZ-45 Compact. But does losing 3/4" to 1" in barrel length make it that much easier to conceal? Right now this may be the direction I am leaning.
I have though about the new Para-Ordnance LLDA 6-45.
I have thought about my Glock 23. Caliber wise this is my second choice. It can be argued that the .40 performs a little better out of the shorter barrel.
Then I have thought about either a Kel-Tech or Kahr. Would be much easier to conceal and I could live with a 9mm in a pinch.
Body wise. I am 6'5" 235lbs. I know that some of you guys that are much smaller carry full sized 1911's with no problem. But honestly are you able to carry them comfortably and able to conceal them properly? I know that the right clothing and so on are a major part of concealment. But I guess know matter what you carry you are going to have to have an untucked shirt or jacket or something so why not then just go with the bigger gun. I would want to be able to carry one gun 90% of the time. So what do you think? Also once again is a Officer sized gun that much easier to conceal than a government sized gun?
Thanks
------------------
"Of those that will penetrate, the edge is always with the bigger bullet."