1911Forum banner

1 - 20 of 399 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
31 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I guess this is a semi-rhetorical question. I know the major objections, which I have listed below with my thoughts on each. I just don't understand the hate towards the 1911 for CCW and how far people go to belittle anyone who does.

I recently posted in a regional forum looking for advice on the best carry 1911 that is compliant in my state. You can't imagine how many snarky replies I received. Why would you carry a 1911, bad choice, capacity, etc., etc.

Manual safety
Folks make a huge issue of the manual safety on the 1911. To me, it is a training issue. If you commit to only carry single action autos, this becomes fairly ingrained and automatic to a point. Now, I thankfully have never been in a situation where I have had to draw a firearm so I don't know what will happen under stress, but my hope is that with consistent training it wouldn't be an issue God forbid.

Capacity
This one, especially for me, is a non-issue. My state restricts us to 10 round magazines. I carry a commander 1911 in 9mm which gives me 10+1. I feel that this would be adequate for most people regardless of your state and local laws. None of us go looking for trouble or will likely be in a sustained gun fight. I can understand objections from LEO's or military personnel, but for civilians, I just don't think this is a big issue.

Reliability
Ok, I can understand this objection as I have owned a 1911 or two that wasn't 100%, but I think reliable models are out there or they can be made reliable with the help of a qualified 1911 smith. No, they will never be Glocks or M&P's in this regard, but I think with a little care and attention, they can be reliable enough for CCW.

What do you guys think?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
177 Posts
I would guess that:
#1 is its very heavy
#2 would be size

Its the same for S&W 3rd Generation 4506-1

Just my opinion
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,634 Posts
What do you guys think?
I think there are many legitimate arguments against the 1911. If folks think those are problems, and they choose something other than a 1911, that's fine.

However, the 1911 has some some features not available on other guns, and if those features are an advantage to you, and they outweigh the disadvantages, the 1911 could be the gun for you.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
663 Posts
I've carried a LW Commander in 45 ACP for most of my adult life, coming up on 40 years.

1. Training issue. When I shoot a non-1911 in matches I find myself wondering where the thumb safety is.

2. I carry 8 round mags with two spares. If I need more than that then I kucked up.

3. Buy good mags, know your gun. I can't remember the last time I had a non-shooter induced malfunction in one of my 1911 pistols. I try and shoot at least 500-700 rounds a month through them.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
12,931 Posts
Because they are Girly-Men...

But seriously, shoot what makes you happy, 1911's are great, but there are a handful of really top-notch poly's out their which will give them a run for their money, my favorite off-1911 semis are the Walther-PPQ familly - trigger likely the best in the poly world and not that far behind a fine custom 1911 trigger, ergonomics just as good as a 1911 (not the "same" but just as effective at least).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,166 Posts
Weight to capacity ratio and the thumb safety, as you note.

Pretty much it. Some will say size, but they likely haven't tried and realized how easy it is to conceal the 1911 due to the flat profile.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,021 Posts
I guess this is a semi-rhetorical question. I know the major objections, which I have listed below with my thoughts on each. I just don't understand the hate towards the 1911 for CCW and how far people go to belittle anyone who does.

I recently posted in a regional forum looking for advice on the best carry 1911 that is compliant in my state. You can't imagine how many snarky replies I received. Why would you carry a 1911, bad choice, capacity, etc., etc.

Manual safety
Folks make a huge issue of the manual safety on the 1911. To me, it is a training issue. If you commit to only carry single action autos, this becomes fairly ingrained and automatic to a point. Now, I thankfully have never been in a situation where I have had to draw a firearm so I don't know what will happen under stress, but my hope is that with consistent training it wouldn't be an issue God forbid.

Capacity
This one, especially for me, is a non-issue. My state restricts us to 10 round magazines. I carry a commander 1911 in 9mm which gives me 10+1. I feel that this would be adequate for most people regardless of your state and local laws. None of us go looking for trouble or will likely be in a sustained gun fight. I can understand objections from LEO's or military personnel, but for civilians, I just don't think this is a big issue.

Reliability
Ok, I can understand this objection as I have owned a 1911 or two that wasn't 100%, but I think reliable models are out there or they can be made reliable with the help of a qualified 1911 smith. No, they will never be Glocks or M&P's in this regard, but I think with a little care and attention, they can be reliable enough for CCW.

What do you guys think?
I think that most people are flaming idiotic lemmings.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,113 Posts
I love the design, craftsmanship, and materials that comprise 1911s. I have plenty of Glocks and M&Ps. They're excellent guns. But the 1911 has a history, and thus a soul. Plus, as an older guy, I grew up with 1911s.

Any gun can malfunction. I've had Glocks malfunction. 1911s may be a bit more finicky, but I'm willing to accept that in order to carry what I love. Besides, if the Sierra is really hitting the fan, then I want a rifle in my hands anyway.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
71,901 Posts
Manual safety
For many people a carry gun with both a manual safety and a passive safety (grip safety) is a lot more reassuring than a short-trigger, striker-fired pistol with no manual safeties at all that will fire if anything contacts the trigger. If you prefer the latter then fine, as long as you train with it. But people who criticize manual-safety guns are idiots.

Capacity
If limited to ten rounds I would rather have 8+1 .45ACP than 10+1 9mm, all else being equal. Citizens have a right to carry guns with whatever capacity they want, but the truth is in 99.99% of civilian-involved shootings the fight is over long before anybody has a chance to expend more than a half-dozen rounds or even reload, assuming they're not simply mag-dumping on their assailant. In other words, outside of wartime capacity is mostly a non-issue.

Reliability
A quality, well-maintained 1911 is more than reliable enough for self-defense or carry use. Civilian gun carriers do not typically fire 5,000 rounds without cleaning nor do they routinely drop their carry guns into a Tupperware container full of soupy Iowa mud.

We 1911 lovers have been dealing with this sort of crap since Day One. At first the 1911 was inferior to a good Single Action Army. Then it was inferior to a good .38 or .357 revolver. Then it was inferior to a double-stack, double action 9mm. Then it was inferior to a .40S&W. Then it was inferior to a Glock, or a SIG, or a whatever. My only advice is, just roll your eyes and carry on.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
834 Posts
the M1911 was designed in a time when men were men , no metrosexuals or snowflakes or any silly stuff like that

the M1911 was originally an American gun made by Americans

the young guys complaining about it now just arent man enough to handle a gun thats been used to win WW1 - WW2 and many battles after
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
205 Posts
All great comments. I have a Dan Wesson Guardian in 9mm that occasionally carry. For me I love the safeties, I train with it and instinctually swipe a safety upon draw with it and my Glock! The main challenge for me and carrying my guardian is the length and angle of the frame. For my build, 6 '1" 210lbs, I find that the angle of the grip causes it to just stick out about 3/4" more than my Glock 19 and tends to print or show more because of it. And that is with both of them in Galco King Tuck holsters with a decent forward cant. Also I carry at the 3:30-4:00 position. So I usually end up carrying the Glock not because I like it more but because it doesn't print nearly as much with it's further swept back grip angle. I've been thinking about buying another holster with a stronger cant to see if the Guardian can come back into the rotation as I really prefer 1911's or the alternative could be to purchase and the Dan Wesson ECO and reduce the frame size to an Officer!

That is always on the table.

Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
71,901 Posts
the M1911 was designed in a time when men were men , no metrosexuals or snowflakes or any silly stuff like that

the M1911 was originally an American gun made by Americans

the young guys complaining about it now just arent man enough to handle a gun thats been used to win WW1 - WW2 and many battles after
I wouldn't go that far. Plenty of guys who carry Glock 19s are just as much men as those who carry a 1911. However the simple fact is that while the 1911 is no longer a practical choice to arm a large military or police force, an individual who chooses his own weapons has just as much reason to pick a 1911 as any other. The so-called negatives of the 1911 simply aren't that relevant in civilian use.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,051 Posts
Manual safety
For many people a carry gun with both a manual safety and a passive safety (grip safety) is a lot more reassuring than a short-trigger, striker-fired pistol with no manual safeties at all that will fire if anything contacts the trigger. If you prefer the latter then fine, as long as you train with it. But people who criticize manual-safety guns are idiots.

Capacity
If limited to ten rounds I would rather have 8+1 .45ACP than 10+1 9mm, all else being equal. Citizens have a right to carry guns with whatever capacity they want, but the truth is in 99.99% of civilian-involved shootings the fight is over long before anybody has a chance to expend more than a half-dozen rounds or even reload, assuming they're not simply mag-dumping on their assailant. In other words, outside of wartime capacity is mostly a non-issue.

Reliability
A quality, well-maintained 1911 is more than reliable enough for self-defense or carry use. Civilian gun carriers do not typically fire 5,000 rounds without cleaning nor do they routinely drop their carry guns into a Tupperware container full of soupy Iowa mud.

We 1911 lovers have been dealing with this sort of crap since Day One. At first the 1911 was inferior to a good Single Action Army. Then it was inferior to a good .38 or .357 revolver. Then it was inferior to a double-stack, double action 9mm. Then it was inferior to a .40S&W. Then it was inferior to a Glock, or a SIG, or a whatever. My only advice is, just roll your eyes and carry on.
This^^^^^^^^^end of discussion.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,415 Posts
WWWBHD? (What would Wild Bill Hickok do?)

IMO, if James Butler Hickok were somehow still alive today, he would have switched to cartridge pistols, then the 1911 when they became available. More power and capacity than his cap-and-ball guns. By 2020, he would have switched to a modern semiauto, such as a Glock or Sig, in whatever caliber he felt was best. Unless like many of us he became completely enamored with 1911s, and then he would have upgraded to Wilsons, Nighthawks, etc.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,902 Posts
When someone asks me why i carry a 1911 instead of one of the more modern designs I simply reply - I don carry a 1911 because it is the best gun I carry it because it is the gun I shoot the best. That pretty well says it all.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
626 Posts
I wouldn't go that far. Plenty of guys who carry Glock 19s are just as much men as those who carry a 1911. However the simple fact is that while the 1911 is no longer a practical choice to arm a large military or police force, an individual who chooses his own weapons has just as much reason to pick a 1911 as any other. The so-called negatives of the 1911 simply aren't that relevant in civilian use.
I agree that most agencies want guns that are lighter and easier to shoot, which the Glock and Glock wannabes are. While that's true, there's a couple of interesting things:

1. The number of police NDs have skyrocketed since the adoption of Glocks. This is the double edged sword of a short trigger pull and no safety.

2. There's a police force in a town near me, which is a suburb of Chicago, where 100% of the force carries 1911s. This isn't a small force either. I thought that to be sort of interesting.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
31 Posts
Discussion Starter #20
Great comments guys! Thank you all for weighing in and keeping it a civil discussion. That is why I love this forum.
 
1 - 20 of 399 Posts
Top