1911Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.

California bans Glocks

5.2K views 124 replies 43 participants last post by  YVK  
#1 ·
No surprise here. It's going to Governor Gruesome's desk and I think odds are pretty good he'll sign it (despite claiming to be pro-Second Amendment :rolleyes: ).

 
Save
#4 ·
Image


On a serious note, though, California is a lost cause. But, then again, what can you expect when the people vote for failure, corruption, depravity, and anti-American priorities.

Never thought I'd say this, but I'm on Glock's side on this one because, while it may start with them, all firearms are on the chopping block. Once the loons get traction banning one, it'll be a snowball effect.
 
#8 ·
That just plain sucks! When are the people of California going to figure it out?
 
Save
#11 ·
Unless Glock follow's Barrett's example, and refuses to sell to them. Which I sincerely do not expect to happen.
 
Save
#10 · (Edited)
This is why "they" don't enforce already existing laws, preferring instead to use the lawlessness of street criminals as their "agents of change" in order to strip rights away from the law abiding folks.

It's also why "they're" soft on crime perpetrated against the ordinary citizenry; the criminals are defacto assets with which to further their social agenda of cracking down on our rights.

All of that considered; I'll be waiting to see the long lines of street gang and cartel members who are already prohibited persons, who will be queing up at California State Glock collection centers to turn in their already illegally altered Glock machine guns.

Gun laws don't eliminate guns, they only criminalize their possession, something only law abiding folks, and not criminals, are in the least concerned about.
 
#15 ·
I expect Oregon and Washington to follow suit too. They seem to want to top California on gun control laws. But then if California police are still using Glocks then criminals will start robbing them next you get the Glocks. They sure do love those Glock switches though. I do hope Glock does like Bond Arms and Barrett did and stop selling to California. Let the CA police buy SIGs that self discharge for no reason.
 
#29 ·
Glock has kept guns two generations old in production just to stay in California market and its restrictive roster. Political activism is not Glock's job and the minute they decided to leave that market, someone else will take their share. Glock will continue to sell there to whoever they can and no other manufacturer that's unaffected by this ban will agree to leave CA LE market for solidarity reasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jackgoyeneche98
Save
#30 ·
Glock has kept guns two generations old in production just to stay in California market and its restrictive roster. …………………. the minute they decided to leave that market, someone else will take their share. Glock will continue to sell there to whoever they can and no other manufacturer that's unaffected by this ban will agree to leave CA LE market for solidarity reasons.
Yep.
I expect you’re right.
But this place is often an outlet for Whimsey…..
 
#32 ·
The more Newscum shows his hand—the better for gun owners. He is slime and will continue to poison and ruin his own chances of pulling the ring on the Merry-Go-Round carnival of politics in America and get the top ticket. Just keep talking to all the women in your life about guns the 2nd A and what POS idiots run and make up the dim party.
 
#34 ·
No, what Glock should so is to help sue the state of California - in Federal court - for criminal malfeasance,
and denial of citizens Constitutional rights.

All it would take is a handful of Californians bringing a class action suit, and Glock could help fund it.

Malfeasance is a broad term that describes conduct that is inherently wrong or unlawful. It is most commonly used in reference to actions by public officials or employees who have failed to perform the duties required of them by statute. This description of corruption or misconduct may be used in both civil and criminal legal actions. To explore this concept, consider the following malfeasance definition.

malfeasence:
  1. The commission, by a public official, of an act that is harmful, legally unjustifiable, or contrary to law.
Origin

1690-1700 French malfaisance (“wrongdoing”)
 
#42 ·
it will be rejected in the scotus, that will take some time, maybe the grand children of the Californians will get the benefit of the reversal. lol
 
Save
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.