There was a time when a broad line between politicians serving the US Citizens and improving their likes verses "what can I do to get the biggest headline today."

 

Or the biggest paycheck…

 

Well there you go, crime suddenly stopped in Kalifornia. You should be thanking your dear leader: Chairman Newsom for his leadership.

 

On a serious note, though, California is a lost cause. But, then again, what can you expect when the people vote for failure, corruption, depravity, and anti-American priorities.

Never thought I'd say this, but I'm on Glock's side on this one because, while it may start with them, all firearms are on the chopping block. Once the loons get traction banning one, it'll be a snowball effect.

 

No doubt Glock will continue selling weapons to the minions of repression.

 

Yes, from what I can see they didn't drop any model from Law Enforcement list. They even list G24 and Glocks in
45 GAP and .357 Sig. The new Aimpoint + Glock COA combo is government contracts only.

 

If you are waiting on Glock to solve gun control you are doing it wrong.

 

I bet Newsome couldn't even identify a Glock in a lineup.

Campaign season began on Nov. 6th 2024 for this used car salesman, and it's now in full swing.

 

That just plain sucks! When are the people of California going to figure it out?

 

Never! The voters of kalifornication have spoken and this what they want.

 

Annnnnndddd…what about all those police and law enforcement departments that have, use and supply staff with Glocks…oh wait…they get yet another exemption.

 

Unless Glock follow's Barrett's example, and refuses to sell to them. Which I sincerely do not expect to happen.

 

This is why "they" don't enforce already existing laws, preferring instead to use the lawlessness of street criminals as their "agents of change" in order to strip rights away from the law abiding folks.

It's also why "they're" soft on crime perpetrated against the ordinary citizenry; the criminals are defacto assets with which to further their social agenda of cracking down on our rights.

All of that considered; I'll be waiting to see the long lines of street gang and cartel members who are already prohibited persons, who will be queing up at California State Glock collection centers to turn in their already illegally altered Glock machine guns.

Gun laws don't eliminate guns, they only criminalize their possession, something only law abiding folks, and not criminals, are in the least concerned about.

 

This, and the gun barrel waiting period and background check, will be coming to Washington state very soon.

 

I guess all the other blue states will soon follow suit. We have a whole bunch of anti-gun legislation being floated right now in Minnesota. Are we in MN farther left than Cali or WA or OR?

 

I expect Oregon and Washington to follow suit too. They seem to want to top California on gun control laws. But then if California police are still using Glocks then criminals will start robbing them next you get the Glocks. They sure do love those Glock switches though. I do hope Glock does like Bond Arms and Barrett did and stop selling to California. Let the CA police buy SIGs that self discharge for no reason.

 

I expect Oregon and Washington to follow suit too. They seem to want to top California on gun control laws.

The good people of Minnesota are close behind.

 

Clearly, Glock failed to contribute to Gruesome Newsom's political campaigns. Now they are made to pay.

 

Is Kamala going to turn in her Glock?

 

Ha ha... you know I was thinking the same thing a little while ago.

 

Typical lefty crap. The gang bangers and bad guys and the ones getting and using the happy switches…so they pass laws to screw law abiding people and owners that don’t actually…you know…break laws.

 

They're not stupid, they realize exactly what they're doing, and what they're doing, is they're following their well laid out blueprint, nothing more.

 

I'm not in CA but FOMO would not make me purchase my first Glock before such a new law went into effect.

IMO, Glock should withdraw entirely from California.

Cheers,
Tim

 

IMO, Glock should withdraw entirely from California.

IMO, California should withdraw completely from the U.S. - it's not like they follow the Constitution anyway.

 

There's no need to think. All current California Glock owners are exempt. It also doesn't seem like private sales are prohibited. I wonder if California gun stores have sold out of Glocks in last couple of days.

 

These firearms mfrs. need to collectively end all Blue City Firearms sales to security and police depts.
Cut off their ammunition as well.
Let these elites and municipalities practice what they preach.
Disarm them forthwith.

 

Glock has kept guns two generations old in production just to stay in California market and its restrictive roster. Political activism is not Glock's job and the minute they decided to leave that market, someone else will take their share. Glock will continue to sell there to whoever they can and no other manufacturer that's unaffected by this ban will agree to leave CA LE market for solidarity reasons.

 

Glock has kept guns two generations old in production just to stay in California market and its restrictive roster. …………………. the minute they decided to leave that market, someone else will take their share. Glock will continue to sell there to whoever they can and no other manufacturer that's unaffected by this ban will agree to leave CA LE market for solidarity reasons.

Yep.
I expect you’re right.
But this place is often an outlet for Whimsey…..

 

The more Newscum shows his hand—the better for gun owners. He is slime and will continue to poison and ruin his own chances of pulling the ring on the Merry-Go-Round carnival of politics in America and get the top ticket. Just keep talking to all the women in your life about guns the 2nd A and what POS idiots run and make up the dim party.

 

No, what Glock should so is to help sue the state of California - in Federal court - for criminal malfeasance,
and denial of citizens Constitutional rights.

All it would take is a handful of Californians bringing a class action suit, and Glock could help fund it.

Malfeasance is a broad term that describes conduct that is inherently wrong or unlawful. It is most commonly used in reference to actions by public officials or employees who have failed to perform the duties required of them by statute. This description of corruption or misconduct may be used in both civil and criminal legal actions. To explore this concept, consider the following malfeasance definition.

malfeasence:

1. The commission, by a public official, of an act that is harmful, legally unjustifiable, or contrary to law.

Origin

1690-1700 French malfaisance (“wrongdoing”)

 

What a difference from a previous California Governor.

 

Then California would fail and ask for US foreign aid.

 

And then we'd have the pleasure of telling them to eat sand.

 

it will be rejected in the scotus, that will take some time, maybe the grand children of the Californians will get the benefit of the reversal. lol

 

As if banning Glocks is going to make Glocks disappear.
1920 to 1933 and Prohibition should give folks a clue.

 

Their expressed goals are not at all the same as their true goals, making arguing against their intentionally malignant logic pointless.