I am reltively new to the 1911 world, have shot many, but until recently, owned none.
I now have a recently purchased Colt M45A1, and even more recently, a SA TRP.
The Colt I am not so concerned about, I do not plan to shoot it, just being a former Marine and like to own it!
The SA however is being shipped to me as we speak. The former owner replaced the 2 piece guide rod with a WC GI full length rod. He is including the original 2 piece as well.
So I know the obvious difference between the two. The number of pieces. Besides that, I do not fully know the pros and cons of each. I have seen a few posts here, but none really compare the two. From what I have seen, the FLGR seems to be favored. But why, and what are the advantages? If a 2 piece can be replaced by a full length for next to nothing, why do manufacturer's bother with the 2 piece in the first place? Are there distinct advantages for the 2 piece besides a shave off the cost?
TIA
I now have a recently purchased Colt M45A1, and even more recently, a SA TRP.
The Colt I am not so concerned about, I do not plan to shoot it, just being a former Marine and like to own it!
The SA however is being shipped to me as we speak. The former owner replaced the 2 piece guide rod with a WC GI full length rod. He is including the original 2 piece as well.
So I know the obvious difference between the two. The number of pieces. Besides that, I do not fully know the pros and cons of each. I have seen a few posts here, but none really compare the two. From what I have seen, the FLGR seems to be favored. But why, and what are the advantages? If a 2 piece can be replaced by a full length for next to nothing, why do manufacturer's bother with the 2 piece in the first place? Are there distinct advantages for the 2 piece besides a shave off the cost?
TIA