I'm now thinking of changing my 1983 (70B28514) MK IV Series 70 Government Model into a modified MEU-SOC. This will involve installing a beavertail GS, a ring hammer, Tritium night sights, Simonich grips and a lanyard loop in the housing. At this point, I'm thinking of retaining the original blued finish which could always be changed later. Same with the barrel and collet bushing.
This Gov Model is in excellent shape and is all-original, but not really collector-grade. Finish is excellent at about 99+%. No original box or papers, but it has the two original mags. The purpose here is to make a pistol that I would actually use rather than just watching it sit in the safe. There are things about the MEU-SOC that I like, and things about the GM that I like, so this will be something in-between. As I see it, there are so many variations of the MEU-SOC that there is simply no real 'formula'. I have seen pictures with flat housings and arched housings; front serrations and without; Pachmyer wraparound grips and Simonich grips; various triggers, sights and accessory rail systems. I like the GM short trigger and arched housing so they will remain. As an alternative, I could leave the grip safety as-is (not sure about this - how the original 'tail' would work with the new hammer) since I don't have any problem with hammer bite. This would make the only permanent change the milling for the sights.
So, who would actually do this, and who would leave the GM as it is?
This Gov Model is in excellent shape and is all-original, but not really collector-grade. Finish is excellent at about 99+%. No original box or papers, but it has the two original mags. The purpose here is to make a pistol that I would actually use rather than just watching it sit in the safe. There are things about the MEU-SOC that I like, and things about the GM that I like, so this will be something in-between. As I see it, there are so many variations of the MEU-SOC that there is simply no real 'formula'. I have seen pictures with flat housings and arched housings; front serrations and without; Pachmyer wraparound grips and Simonich grips; various triggers, sights and accessory rail systems. I like the GM short trigger and arched housing so they will remain. As an alternative, I could leave the grip safety as-is (not sure about this - how the original 'tail' would work with the new hammer) since I don't have any problem with hammer bite. This would make the only permanent change the milling for the sights.
So, who would actually do this, and who would leave the GM as it is?