Aren't those two names for the same model?

 

They are quite uncommon. "Any good?" I don't know, never saw one being shot.

No, Brian, not the same thing.

 

The linkless pistols used the barrel lower lugs of the Omega, but with standard upper locking lugs, ejection port, etc.
You don't get the dual extractors, caliber conversion capability, and other Omega features.
I saw a Linkless 10mm in a gun store, 20 years ago(?), and have never seen another.

 

Spingfield Linkless

Here is link to someone else Linkless 1911
http://www.defensivecarry.com/forum...al-firearm-discussion/197891-i-did-again-bought-another-1911-linkless-10mm.html
Just like the one I see at the gun show.

 

Thanks for learnin' me something today, gang. Darned if I didn't see an Omega at the Ohio Gun Collectors' Association show this past weekend. They turn up occasionally. But this other model, never laid eyes on and don't recall it.

 

I own a Linkless 40 duotone, bought it new...but have never fired it..

 

I have several odd guns
Linkless is one

 

If you still have yours, I would be indebted to you if you'd be kind enough to send me a scan or photocopy of the owners manual.

 

Thanks for the picture, Is that a 10mm or 40mm Hairtrigger?

 

It is a 10mm

 

I have a linkless 10mm and am currently on a search for parts. it shoots beautifully, and is extremely accurate. The singular issue is that parts are hard to come by.

 

First time this box has seen the light of day in probably 18 to 20 years

Even the box is just the Springfield 1911- A1

And so is the manual, with the addition of the link list part. Shoot me a reply or an email and I will put whatever you want on the scanner for a higher quality coffee

 

Just scanned and emailed

 

Thank you very much for sending this. I'm really surprised that Springfield has nothing in here on reassembly, in particular the semi-circular bushing that slides onto the recoil spring guide. I had assumed that the manual would have answer this question so I didn't spend a lot of time on this before, but now I'll go back and take a closer look at this to figure it out.

 

More interesting reading if you google Peters Stahl