1911Forum banner
1 - 6 of 72 Posts
My carry selection is based upon logic that comes from an entirely different perspective.

Living in Marylandistan, my carry guns are ones that I consider to be disposable because if ever used in a self-defense situation, it will likely be confiscated and possibly destroyed even if I am found to be completely justified.

For this reason, I do not carry my only 1911. It is nothing special, just a Colt slide and internals on an early Essex frame, but it shoots well, looks good, and is in excellent condition. Perhaps once another is acquired, this will change.

Since it is also my only pistol chambered in .45 ACP, carry pieces are mostly 9mm PMFs that have been serialized, with an occasional 9x18 Makarov or 7.62x25 Tokarev mixed in.

For many years, .25 and .32 ACP pocket pistols were the standard for individual self-defense. Now they are considered by many to be ineffective.

I am of the opinion that shot placement is more important than caliber selection. Be proficient with your carry guns, know their limitations and yours, ... and almost anything can be effective for self defense.
The main advantage of 9mm Luger is small size of pistol. The smallest .45ACP is HS XDs which is substantially larger then R9 or DB9. I would take .40 S&W over both, however my new main weapon will be .357 Magnum loaded with either 125gr or 158gr Hornady HTP ammo depending on environment I find myself in. It will be in my hands few weeks from now.
 
Finally, the definitive thread that provides permanent closure on the topic of 9mm vs .45ACP once and for all.

I'm glad I came across it.
The one thing .45 has going for it is large heavy bullet with no expansion needed. Most civilians don't have to worry about overpeneration because crime does not usually occur when there are crowds of people around. There are certain exceptions like pickpocketing, for example.
 
1 - 6 of 72 Posts