1911Forum banner
81 - 100 of 217 Posts
All SA 1911s have been machined in their Illinois factory for over a decade now. Compare a field stripped SA made in the past 10 years to a Tisas, and it becomes obvious they are not the same. A super obvious difference is the relief cut in the dust cover of a Tisas frame near the front rail. This does not exist on a SA.
The machining of Springfield's in Illinois does not preclude the raw forgings coming from Turkey, or elsewhere for that matter.
 
My Stingray has ~ 1000 rounds through it without so much as a hiccup. Eats the cheap remanufactured stuff that I still have from the great Covid era ammo shortage that my SA XDM Elite turns its nose up at. Takes all the mags from my other 1911s without complaint.

My only issue with Tisas is I’d wish they’d come out with the D10 Yukon before I got my Girsan Hunter.
 
I’ve been following this thread with some interest. I’m fortunate, I shoot in my backyard. So I figured I’d take the Tisas Service Special for a spin this afternoon. Just 2 8 rounders and a Chip Mc 10. Does what it always does. Eats them, spits them, asks for more. It’s quite an amazing 1911. It has never once had a bobble. Not once.

I’m one of these guys that folks might think is a bit odd. You see, I see a pistol as first and foremost a defensive weapon. Something you would expect to save your life if need be. To me, that’s its primary purpose. Therefore, when I buy a pistol, any brand, any make, any style, I expect it to go bang when I squeeze the trigger and to be ready immediately to do that again.

That hasn’t always been the case with some pistols I’ve owned. And there’s nothing that infuriates me more. I don’t think that’s asking to much.

I bought a Tisas based upon what I’d read here and seen on YouTube. I wasn’t expecting much considering the price.

Well they do exactly what I expect a pistol to do. That makes me a very satisfied customer.

That cheap Service Special is an amazing 1911. And I’d trust my life with it.

And that’s why I buy pistols.
 
I have two Tisas Bantam Carry pistols.
Bought the 9mm version first. Terrible with some ammo, good with some and inbetween with other ammo. Multiple magazine brands, no change.
An EGW high lift mag catch fixed it.

The .45 was just perfect from the start. Ran everything including 200gr SWC.
 
To the point abotu not shooting them much... My 45acp stash is at an all time low in the almost 2 years since I started reloading... Which was weeks after I bought my first Tisas 1911a1 45acp pistol. Since then I've consumed 4000 LPPs and 1000 SPPs on 45acp ammo alone, plus that first bag of 350 rounds I bought reman. I shot almost all of that before I bought the tanker 1911 or the Ruger LC carbine, so I'm betting I've got at least 4000 rounds through mine.

My issues have eben entirely my fault, with some being my cheap LPPs causing FTF on first or second strike, and my doubts about the sights being .030ish off center despite other people shooting it better than me, or that time I forced a +p round tha wouldn't chamber and blew the walnut slabs into my palms.

I should have added in my first post that I also bought the 1911a1 in 9mm, which I didn't like and sold. It had an occasional habit in the first 500 rounds of FTE, but that went away sometime before 1000 when I sold it to a friend. Taht friend bought it mostly to complain about anyway, because its not a glock, and doesn't shoot much, so I'll never know if he shoots it better than I did.
 
All SA 1911s have been machined in their Illinois factory for over a decade now. Compare a field stripped SA made in the past 10 years to a Tisas, and it becomes obvious they are not the same. A super obvious difference is the relief cut in the dust cover of a Tisas frame near the front rail. This does not exist on a SA.

There have been dozens of reports on many forums about the change in the forged slides and frames at Springfield Armory. I do not know when they dropped the frames from Brazil, I thought it as late 2016. And here is what they still say about their 1911s. But they are no longer marked as being from Embrel.

Image



It is only a few years ago and I have forgotten why they changed from the Enbrel but I think it was simple better quality at lower price. I thought there was a thread on this site and there is, here is one where it first was mentioned about the Highpower. That was the start of the discussion as I recall it because Springfield had changed from getting their forgings from Ebrel and when the moved to the Tisas for the Highpower forgings we learned that they also had contracts for the frames and slides with Tisas.

Image


And here was the immediate reply from Tisas a rep that was on this forum at one time. Please feel free to ask him to confirm or deny. It puts him in a hard spot because, I think, Springfield Armory does not want people to know. And this Tisas rep is with the company location in the US, aka Tisas USA.

Image



And so the controversy started. That Gun Digest article claimed the Springfield Highpower was made in the USA, but Richard Mann claimed the gun was forged by Tisas elsewhere. The controversy was whether "made in the USA" is the same as "Assembled in the USA". Here is a comment on that issue too.

Image


All of this happened in 2022 or so. Here is a post from the Tisas rep.

Image



And remember, Springfield Armory was in trouble as a company and had to make lots of business decisions to survive. Some may remember when they tried to ban ARs in their state. Remember this?

Why Is Everyone Boycotting Springfield Armory? (gunstoday.com) SPringfield Armory attempted to drive all small firearms dealers in Illinois out of business at one time, a boycott changed their mind when their anti-second amendment secret deal came to light.

"In 2017, the company faced controversy during consideration in the Illinois state legislature of a bill (SB-1657) that would restrict firearms transfers within the state. An organization that Springfield Armory and Rock River Arms—both based in Illinois—provided funding to, the Illinois Firearms Manufacturers Association (IFMA), initially opposed the bill.[27] Following efforts by IFMA's lobbyist, the bill was amended to exempt Illinois-based manufacturers, apparently in exchange for IFMA dropping its opposition to the bill.[27] This action created "tremendous customer backlash" as the deal was made "at the expense of everyday gun owners".[28] This was followed by the IFMA being dissolved and the companies subsequently opposing SB-1657, which was eventually vetoed.[28]

Springfield Armory quickly reacted once the actions of the IFMA were revealed to the company, with the company releasing the following statement from Reese: "I can tell you now, we at Springfield Armory are unequivocally 100 percent against this bill and will continue to work with the NRA and others to ensure that it is defeated. Springfield Armory ... was not aware of the actions taken by trade association, IFMA, until after the fact."[29]"
Springfield Armory, Inc. - Wikipedia

Of course Springfield Armory is just a name that is not affiliated in anyway with the real Springfield Armory that was a historic government arms company. Most of their products are clones, the 1911, the M1a, the Beretta M9, the Browning Highpower clone and others.

And remember who they are in recent year. Much of their product line is just imported and fully made in other countries, and just branded as Springfield Armory.

T"""he Springfield Armory XD is a series of semi-automatic pistols sold by Springfield Armory, Inc., in the United States along with follow-on variants: XD-M, XD-S, and XD-E.[1] Polymer-framed and predominantly striker-fired, the series is manufactured by HS Produkt in Karlovac, Croatia.""" "Springfield Armory XD - Wikipedia

The Hellcat is one of their better selling imports.

"""""The Springfield Armory Hellcat is a polymer frame striker-fired micro-compact semi-automatic pistol sold in the United States by Springfield Armory, Inc., and manufactured in Croatia by HS Produkt.[7]""""
Springfield Armory Hellcat - Wikipedia
-------------------------------------------
Springfield Armory makes it's money from guns it imports from a socialist country. A country that does not respect the private right of gun ownership.

Some people would not buy a gun from a company who sources it's primary products from socialist or communist countries. Some people do not care. It is all a matter or personal preference. We spend our dollars to support companies whose values we approve of, or some of us do not care, we just want the product regardless of who makes it. Personally in a global market, buying from a company like Springfield Amory does not matter much, except, each dollar spent encourages them to do more business with those countries.

The bottom line as to the subject of whether Tisas supplies all the frames and slides for Springfield Amory 1911s, is that we asked the Tisas rep to confirm or deny. The only answer he would give is that Tisas had lots of contracts for those parts with many companies but he could not or would not disclose the fact that Springfield Army 1911 slides and frames were made by Tisas. It put him in a hard spot and he left the forum.

The answer was clear, and since Springfield Armory will not answer that question, somebody asked them direct. On another forum. All they would say is the get their forged frames and slides from a US company. And we know that US company to be, Tisas USA. And we know Tisas USA does not have a forge, so they are made by Tisas, shipped to the Tisas USA facility and them supplied to Springfield Armory.

And unless they have found a cheaper supplier that is where they still get them today. They take those frames and slide polish them and put any finishing touches or changes they want on them. And everybody is happy with that arrangment.
 
From all I've read, Imbel has a reputation of making the highest possible quality forgings. If SA switched suppliers - which they obviously have - IMO it would have been for cost savings and not a quality issue.

Like government contracting goes...the brand "low bid" usually wins out.
 
And the discussion is about Tisas who forges all of their frames and slides and whether they are reliable or not. The overwhelming majority of folks say they are and most of the large on=line databases of reviews say the same.

Unrelated, but does a forged frame make a gun more reliable or not? Some of us think, so, but the problem is, we cannot prove it. Ruger has used investment cast forever, they are reported as being among the most reliable.

Studies have looked at the AK 47 and whether the forged receivers are better than the stamped ones. There is a problem with those studies. For the first 100,000 rounds there appears to be no difference in terms of durability or longevity, so which is better? We cannot say.

But given the choice, most of us are convinced forged is better, but we do not know why. As to Tisas, that gives them an advantage over many, because we think forged is better.

Just saying, that may be why so many are great, or it may not be. When you buy a $500 handgun and it is 100% you praise it, when you buy a $5000 gun that is 100% you praise it. When you buy any gun that is not 100% we find a 100 reasons for blame, seems to me.

Just observational. If we personally have not tested a large number, our observations are just that, guesses.

As to Springfield Armory, I have no proof of why they changed suppliers of slides and frames. I do know the timing was similar to when they used the Tisas frames and slides for the Highpower and that was around the time, they started importing much of their handguns from Croatia, the Hellcat, the XDM many of which they are discontinuing now, the XD Elite, the EMP line, the little 911 which I think they are also discontinuing. Competition is pretty stiff today. Modern manufacturing has come a very long way. For $300-$500 you can buy some very good handguns these days that are 100% reliable and serve the folks that just want a gun for defense very well at low cost for a lifetime. And then of course there are Glock clones and even original Glocks, they run thousands and thousands of rounds.....and then you have to clean them....

Companies sell products to make money, and when they do not make enough money, they change product lines, for something that sells better and makes more money. Who knows what Springfield Armory will do next. I suspect they will always make the M1A and probably always offer a 1911, thinks that they do well.
 
Forging involves compressing metal under high pressure while it’s still solid, which aligns the grain structure and reduces internal voids.

Casting on the other hand involves pouring molten metal into a mold which can introduce porosity in the metal’s structure. Over time this porous part will fail.

Also machining forged metal produces better results than machining the porous cast. Ie. You can carve a log but you can’t carve plywood.
 
Forging involves compressing metal under high pressure while it’s still solid, which aligns the grain structure and reduces internal voids.

Casting on the other hand involves pouring molten metal into a mold which can introduce porosity in the metal’s structure. Over time this porous part will fail.

Also machining forged metal produces better results than machining the porous cast. Ie. You can carve a log but you can’t carve plywood.
True in theory, but at what point in time do they fail? Glock slides are all molded, they appear to have the longest life span of any handgun.

And how much shooting in a lifetime does it take to affect the structure of that part? Prior to 1964 Winchesters including lever guns were said to be made of forged parts. Post 64 they used an investment cast process which was still a small forging just in the form or a receiver or part.

So, how big is the slab that is poured into a vat and cooled slowly and called metal that is later ground down into a forged part, and how much difference is there in a much smaller slab of metal that is poured into a tiny vat and cooled slowly. One requires a lot of grinding, the other not so much.

How many Winchesters have come apart based upon the forging vs the casting, since 1964? Not sure we can measure the difference in products like guns. Maybe heavy industrial machines, but what about guns>


Just saying, we overbuild guns for safety reasons, so much it may not matter at all.
 
Discussion starter · #99 ·
True in theory, but at what point in time do they fail? Glock slides are all molded, they appear to have the longest life span of any handgun.

And how much shooting in a lifetime does it take to affect the structure of that part? Prior to 1964 Winchesters including lever guns were said to be made of forged parts. Post 64 they used an investment cast process which was still a small forging just in the form or a receiver or part.

So, how big is the slab that is poured into a vat and cooled slowly and called metal that is later ground down into a forged part, and how much difference is there in a much smaller slab of metal that is poured into a tiny vat and cooled slowly. One requires a lot of grinding, the other not so much.

How many Winchesters have come apart based upon the forging vs the casting, since 1964? Not sure we can measure the difference in products like guns. Maybe heavy industrial machines, but what about guns>


Just saying, we overbuild guns for safety reasons, so much it may not matter at all.
Glock slides are machined either from barstock or a custom blank.

Bar stock is not a casting.

"The production process for a single bar starts with ingots cast from molten metal from the blast furnace. The nuggets are then heated to red-hot in an electric or gas furnace before they are rolled out into long strips called slabs, which will be cut into smaller pieces called billets.
The billets will be heated again to make them malleable enough to be forged into shapes like angle irons or beams before being cut off at lengths that fit customer specifications.
" https://www.precisiongroundbars.com/blog/the-complete-guide-to-steel-bar-stock/

Forging is not grinding a casting to shape. Perhaps I misunderstood.

Either a forging or a casting is closer to final form and require less machining than bar stock/billet steel.

All that said, I agree that forged, machined from billet, or cast frames and slides are all safe.
 
81 - 100 of 217 Posts